(May 2, 2010 11:12 AM)Vibe Wrote:  Would this work in Counter-Strike ?

(May 3, 2010 04:04 AM)ztrain Wrote:  how would you write something that scans for a memory address like cheat engine?
we are making a game in our programing class, and the teacher is going to have a rigged character. hes going to be standing there so i cant use CE to scan for addresses, so how would i do this in code?

(May 4, 2010 05:14 AM)Justsomeguy Wrote:  If i could +rep you i should do it very nice organized i suck at reading topics like this but this one totally helped me out thank you dude :)

(May 5, 2010 10:13 AM)PoZHx Wrote:  @The One:

Code

DWORD PCross = NULL;

_declspec(naked) void PremCross()
{
    __asm
    {
        jmp PCross;
    }
}

Would not jump to an address...
Within __ASM you shouldn't know the addresses
You should really push address onto stack and ret or
move the address into register (e.g. EAX) but that way is more detectable since your leaving modified register

You should really use some Code-Injection for your hacks instead of writting to memory with:

Code

*(float*)(ADR_SPEED) = 200;

Microsoft MSDetours ? If so it leaves behind 0xE8 bytes which are detectable by Anti-Cheating software.

Code

DetourFunc

Code

memcpy((LPBYTE*)ADR_PREMIUMCROSSHAIR1, (BYTE*)"\x0F\x84\x86\x01\x00\x00",6); // Function will be turned off

You have direct access to memory you don't have to call this internal function.

Tip/advise: You could made a function which backup previous bytes before modifying them.. which makes it easier to toogle options.

Finally your DLL code is very messy:
e.g.

Code

void HackThread() // HackThread makes the hack inject
{
for(;; )
{
SpeedHack(); // This puts the hack on.
}
Sleep(200); // Protect from overload
}

Why not just write it like:

Code

void HackThread() // HackThread makes the hack inject
{
for(;;Sleep(200))
{
// Your hack here instead of calling a function
}

Your not dealing with attach/deattach thread messages in your DLL
why not disable them? save you more memory

There is alot of other things i could suggest but i hope these have being helpful :)

(May 5, 2010 11:08 AM)The-One Wrote:  I have a function with automatically gets the off bytes for a address.

(May 5, 2010 11:08 AM)The-One Wrote:  Microsoft Detours will work, i'm using an bypass which bypass the whole anti cheat.

(May 6, 2010 10:47 AM)PoZHx Wrote:  Cool since i thought your actual coding was very uneffective and messy.

(May 5, 2010 11:08 AM)The-One Wrote:  Microsoft Detours will work, i'm using an bypass which bypass the whole anti cheat.

Yeah it may work but still it's more easy to detect and requires you to
accept Microsoft Detours Licence argeement and not very efficent as writting your own.

(May 7, 2010 02:24 PM)greed460 Wrote:  Hah. I was about to write nearly the same as pozhx

(May 8, 2010 07:23 AM)Haxor94 Wrote:  I have a hacking project but how i make it .exe so ppl can open it and shit please help me out :D?