+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151)
+---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118)
+---- Thread: [.NET] FUD Survey Locker Tutorial! | Tutorial in Thread! | Many Features (/showthread.php?tid=4407202)
* - IAmNotHere - Aug 24, 2014
Some cool codes. Will look forward to try to put some of the functions in my project, if ok with you. I don't do survey lockers. Thank you!
* - Voidlight - Aug 24, 2014
(Aug 24, 2014 02:50 PM)IAmNotHere Wrote: Some cool codes. Will look forward to try to put some of the functions in my project, if ok with you. I don't do survey lockers. Thank you!
Feel free to use this in your program. If you plan on releasing it, please leave credits.
* - -zERAiT - Aug 24, 2014
Nice tutorial and good contribution.
I might release my lockers source, which I made back in the days, but not sure yet tho.
* - NETExplorer - Aug 24, 2014
![[Image: uUIjsq6.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/uUIjsq6.gif)
Please, follow that tutorial!
* - Voidlight - Aug 24, 2014
(Aug 24, 2014 05:15 PM)PatPositron Wrote:
Please, follow that tutorial!
Not gunna lie, that made me laugh. Good job sir.
* - Routess - Aug 26, 2014
Your code should never include the password, you should check it with a server or even use a Hash-Encryption.
Ofc there are a lot more things that you could improve but all in all its quite OK :)
* - Voidlight - Aug 26, 2014
(Aug 26, 2014 06:13 AM)Routess Wrote: Your code should never include the password, you should check it with a server or even use a Hash-Encryption.
Ofc there are a lot more things that you could improve but all in all its quite OK :)
I agree, but if you obfuscate the code there shouldn't be an issue.
Any other suggestions for tutorials not seen yet?
* - NFusionGame - Aug 27, 2014
(Aug 26, 2014 06:13 AM)Routess Wrote: Your code should never include the password, you should check it with a server or even use a Hash-Encryption.Using a hash for comparison is about as secure as a plain text password when it comes to .net because if they can read the password through dis-assembly or memory scanning they can (almost always) also just replace the stored hash with an already known one or simply Null the check. Although I also would still go for a hashed password because you could implement checks in the code for the correct hash (again these could be patched).
Ofc there are a lot more things that you could improve but all in all its quite OK :)
Thinking on the matter further I would asymmetrically encrypt files using RSA. As it would be the best security against unauthorized removal because if the encryption has been done properly the only way your going to be getting those files back is by using the private key which only we know (which would have to be unique for each instance of the software, so needs some server side element to gen and distribute the keys).
* - Meow - Aug 27, 2014
Very nice tutorial! I'm sure it will help me A LOT! 🤝
* - Voidlight - Aug 30, 2014
(Aug 27, 2014 05:23 PM)Meow. Wrote: Very nice tutorial! I'm sure it will help me A LOT! 🤝
Thank you!, I'm glad it helped you out!
* - Voidlight - Sep 6, 2014
Bump
Spoiler (Click to View)
* - felicixus - Sep 7, 2014
Nice to see my source code copied and pasted anywhere :)
Thanks for credits dude (sarcasm)
* - TheBarret - Sep 7, 2014
Wow what a piece crap, you assume that you write like that to the registery and you assume that u can run bcdedit without the proper admin elevation. Not to mention the unhandled exception block.
Fuck me dude, this is totally worthless.
* - OffCode - Sep 7, 2014
Make new tutorial and How make Builder + Stub :P
* - Voidlight - Sep 15, 2014
(Sep 7, 2014 03:14 PM)MaguEXE Wrote: Make new tutorial and How make Builder + Stub :P
I will in the future, there are many tutorials on builders.