![]() |
|
[Java] JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [Java] JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator (/showthread.php?tid=6165583) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - MavenGradle - Aug 25, 2022 (Aug 25, 2022 02:43 AM)PELock Wrote: You didn't deobfuscate shit, how did you come up with the original names of the variables if they were completely removed? I tell you how - you did take it from my website. So technically you didn't deobfuscate it, just copied the original source from my website (my mistake). Like I said: Make it harder. You're so predictable that I can get the original code with variables and everything using a single brain cell and 1 minute of work. Makes me wonder how good your products really are when you come up with shit like this. Anyone else feel the same way or is it just me? That's all it took. A single brain cell to get the original source code back. So fix your mistake. And stop calling people idiots when the real idiot is you for posting a simple challenge like this and maybe stop crying about donations (AsmJit anyone 🙂) too, it's sad. You're giving your own products a bad name with shit like this and I'm seriously disappointed in you for your marketing. PR is obviously not your strong suit. In light of this, please watch this beginner's guide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bcviGzi84c RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Aug 25, 2022 What was the goal? To deobfuscate the code. What you did? Took the original source from my site. How smart of you. Did you do the deobfuscation? No. Now you cry like a little bitch because you thought you can outsmart everyone while in fact you didn't do the task you did. PS. And if you read about Asmjit donations, I have donated to this project since beta version, I was the first to donate money and many times more afterwards, I had a deal with the author to include my link for the 1st ever donation made to it - and what did I get in return after the years have passed? A big fuck you for being the first person to support the project financially. And now, when they have plenty of other donations they forgat who supported it many times when they had zero customers... Petr Kobalicek is just an ungrateful bastard... Screw him and screw you, how about that? Is that bad for a PR? Let me laugh even more :) RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - MavenGradle - Aug 25, 2022 This is so sad. I guess you will never learn. Best of luck to you PELock . You should write more blog posts about it, you might end up on the github hall of cringe fails. That would be a great advertisement. RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Aug 25, 2022 Stop it, get some help & learn how to deobfuscate shit NOT how to be a smartass. I can get you 5% discount for your cleverness! I'm in awe of your googling skills. RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - WebDev - Sep 18, 2022 i already know about it. thanks RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - Tizen - Oct 8, 2022 (Aug 25, 2022 04:11 AM)PELock Wrote: What was the goal? What a shame. I genuinely have a need for source-level obfuscation right now but I'll look elsewhere. Glad I read the comments. He won the giveaway fair and square, maybe next time separate your challenge from public domain. RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Oct 11, 2022 Of course, you "genuinely" do! I was crying all the way to the bank... hahahahahahahahhahahahah RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - Bonjo - Sep 7, 2023 Legit this is the worst obfuscator known to man OWNER IS A RUDE POLISH CUNT, WHO IS SAD FAT AND A VIRGIN RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Nov 9, 2023 But it's the most profitable software for me, I shit with shitcoins thanks to it! So get fucked! RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - May 13, 2026 A new version of JObfuscator is available - https://www.pelock.com/jobfuscator/ (desktop + cli https://www.pelock.com/products/jobfuscator/download) Engine changes v1.30 - 14.05.2026
Client history v1.3 - 14.05.2026
Added more generous free demo options, that include 2000 char limit plus four obfuscation strategies
Anyways, you can get a free code if you can read ;) RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Jun 3, 2026 You can now fully automate and integrate obfuscation process by using JObfuscator Maven pre-compiler plugin (you just need to upgrade your pom.xml configuration file). https://github.com/PELock/JObfuscator-Maven-Compiler Engine changes v1.40 - 03.06.2026
Client changes v1.4 - 03.06.2026
RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - TonicBox - Jun 27, 2026 Neat project. string encryption and the int-extraction pass are real techniques, and writing your own engine definitely teaches you stuff. But tbh source-level is kind of a dead end for Java specifically. The problem is javac gets the last word. Anything you emit has to survive being re-parsed and recompiled. So you're limited by java source spec and what JAVAC accepts at the source level. And worse, the compiler partially undoes your work on the way: - constant folding - DCE - canonicalizing control flow - And so on... You limit yourself also from ever breaking decompilers or real analysis in any way (Irreducible flow, dynamic-family instruction nesting edge cases, type confusion, etc) Bytecode obfuscators run after javac, so nothing gets a second pass at cleaning them up. Not saying you wasted your time, genuinely valuable if written in the interest of learning, there's places for complex source transformation stuff. Just, in practice, production application protection is not one of them. RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Jul 1, 2026 I have tested it against latest JEBDec with AI decompilation and it failed, so it's production ready. Javac doesn't flatten control flow or optimize constant folding, because it's not x = 1 + 2 but its using external sources like arrays. Bytecode obfuscation cannot achive what I can do on AST high level and vice versa, I cannot use bytecode GOTO instruction for example. So there are cons and pros. Also - this isn't my last word, there are more improvements coming in. Thank you for the comments, I might even build bytecode obfuscator to work along AST obfuscation to achieve even better results. RE: JObfuscator Java Source Code Obfuscator - PELock - Aug 4, 2026 v1.50 - 04.08.2026
|