+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hack Forums Official Information (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Site News (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trust Scan Improvement (#3) (/showthread.php?tid=5241907)
* - ๖ۣۜStark - Apr 19, 2016
Hi omni
thanks for new change, i like green :)
* - Description - Apr 19, 2016
Nice update i like it 👍
* - webdev77 - Apr 19, 2016
Looks pretty cool. It certainly makes it pretty easy to tell if there are potential problems.
* - Stashyy - Apr 19, 2016
Looks great, I love the improvement. :)
* - Omniscient - Apr 19, 2016
On the Trust Scan page the Deal Dispute results are now directly linked to the search results of the DDDB page. It's also now color coded. Green for 0 as defendant, yellow for 1 or 2, and red for 3 or more.
* - ra1d - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 11:36 AM)Omniscient Wrote: On the Trust Scan page the Deal Dispute results are now directly linked to the search results of the DDDB page. It's also now color coded. Green for 0 as defendant, yellow for 1 or 2, and red for 3 or more.
That's super neat, really useful in my opinion.
* - TheVBScripter - Apr 19, 2016
I use Trust Scan almost a few times a day now, so pretty nice work Omniscient! 🤝
* - Travis Bickle - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 11:36 AM)Omniscient Wrote: On the Trust Scan page the Deal Dispute results are now directly linked to the search results of the DDDB page. It's also now color coded. Green for 0 as defendant, yellow for 1 or 2, and red for 3 or more.
Ayyye, my man listened, I'm starting to like you a lot more now.🤝
thanks.
Edit: Just another quick suggestion, that is not worth a thread, but if you think it is good, you should add it. At the bottom, where says about ub3r, you could perhaps make that blue if you're in the group or something?
* - Moxxi - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 11:36 AM)Omniscient Wrote: On the Trust Scan page the Deal Dispute results are now directly linked to the search results of the DDDB page. It's also now color coded. Green for 0 as defendant, yellow for 1 or 2, and red for 3 or more.
I know you could just check the database, but 100% for convenience sake would it be possible or maybe a good idea on the deal dispute line to put like "Date of last dispute" (as in a dispute AGAINST them) so you could quickly see if they have had recent deal disputes or if it was from a long time ago
* - Travis Bickle - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 12:47 PM)Mоxxi Wrote: I know you could just check the database, but 100% for convenience sake would it be possible or maybe a good idea on the deal dispute line to put like "Date of last dispute" (as in a dispute AGAINST them) so you could quickly see if they have had recent deal disputes or if it was from a long time ago
This shouldn't matter. If someone scammed 3 years ago and it was unresolved, what is stopping them from still scamming? It should be like this in my opinion:
Deal Disputes (Claiment/Resolved Defendant/Resolved Defendants) e.g. 1/0/1 (then have each one specifically colour coded instead of the whole line.)
* - Moxxi - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 12:50 PM)Travis Bickle Wrote: This shouldn't matter. If someone scammed 3 years ago and it was unresolved, what is stopping them from still scamming? It should be like this in my opinion:
Deal Disputes (Claiment/Resolved Defendant/Resolved Defendants) e.g. 1/0/1
True, but theres also scam reports that are invalid for certain deals, like selling a public ebook 3 years ago has nothing to do with them being valid in a currency exchange if they have been legit for 3 years up till now. Also on the off chance that someone just didnt close the dispute, or the person who opened it got closed themself or left the forum.
IDK was just an idea lol but I see what youre sayin
* - Travis Bickle - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 12:53 PM)Mоxxi Wrote: True, but theres also scam reports that are invalid for certain deals, like selling a public ebook 3 years ago has nothing to do with them being valid in a currency exchange if they have been legit for 3 years up till now. Also on the off chance that someone just didnt close the dispute, or the person who opened it got closed themself or left the forum.
IDK was just an idea lol but I see what youre sayin
I know what you also mean as well. But if someone hasn't fixed a dispute then it should still be shown as a dispute in my opinion. Although I think my idea is good ;)
* - Omniscient - Apr 19, 2016
(Apr 19, 2016 12:47 PM)Mоxxi Wrote: I know you could just check the database, but 100% for convenience sake would it be possible or maybe a good idea on the deal dispute line to put like "Date of last dispute" (as in a dispute AGAINST them) so you could quickly see if they have had recent deal disputes or if it was from a long time ago
Wow. Do you expect me to hand feed you everything?
Seriously!
LIKE WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU? CLICK THE F'N LINK!
* - Portugal - Apr 19, 2016
Excellent updates.
I use the trust scan feature constantly, it's really useful.
* - eCoLoGy - Apr 19, 2016
Great job on the updates Omni. 👍