![]() |
|
[.NET] Thread Closed 38 - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [.NET] Thread Closed 38 (/showthread.php?tid=1310986) |
Thread Closed 38 - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 This thread is old and it has been closed. I may update it later... * - Doctor07 - May 22, 2011 Nice post buddy, I'll come back later and read through this thoroughly. * - RiperFish - May 22, 2011 Well, we have something New Here, Congratulation but you still can use write/Read TO Bypass a lot of AV's :).Great Work man 5/5. * - Ghostenigma - May 22, 2011 I like that you made your keylogger stub FUD! Any credits is apriciated no?! Anyway Good work! * - C-Digg - May 22, 2011 Amazing tutorial, intriguing and unique at the same time. Great job! * - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 Great you all liked it, and yh I made my keylogger FUD using ONLY these tricks above, and I wanna also thanks Gogoli who helped me in these stuff, thanks man * - KingCobraXD - May 22, 2011 Nice tutorial. I got tow things to say though.... 1. Ur grammar is off a little. Lol. 2. If ur server gets detected, u can't do the same thing again. The most you can do again is replace the variable names. Lol. * - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 (May 22, 2011 04:27 AM)KingCobraXD Wrote: Nice tutorial. I got tow things to say though.... 1- I know, I learn English as third language. :P 2- Your server is hard to get detected, and you can make it FUD again, by changing again the assembly information and by changing the names again using Ctrl+H so as you can also change the names of your class and it becomes FUD again. * - Banksу - May 22, 2011 (May 22, 2011 04:27 AM)KingCobraXD Wrote: Nice tutorial. I got tow things to say though.... 1. Your first point is such a fail. 2. Yep. Good tutorial I guess 😝 * - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 (May 22, 2011 07:03 AM)Banksy™ Wrote: 1. Your first point is such a fail. well yh firstly I just said it:P , and thanks for your support * - Lemon ツ - May 22, 2011 Looks nice, thanks for the share. * - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 (May 22, 2011 09:18 AM)OИE Wrote: Looks nice, thanks for the share. great you liked it and thanks a lot for your support * - felicixus - May 22, 2011 For vb.NET application you can obfuscate code after you've builded the file This makes it more undetactable =) I personally use xenocode but there are lot of better around ;) * - The Unknown - May 22, 2011 (May 22, 2011 09:30 AM)felicinox Wrote: For vb.NET application you can obfuscate code after you've builded the file yh, but making it manually is also good, if it gets detected again, you can just follow these steps and it's FUD again * - Sabok36 - May 22, 2011 I love you <3 Thanks for the code. |