Hack Forums
Hard Crackme - Final Try - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Blackhat Training (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=405)
+----- Forum: Reverse Engineering (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=229)
+----- Thread: Hard Crackme - Final Try (/showthread.php?tid=2026979)

Pages: Pages 1 2

Hard Crackme - Final Try - blackperuvian - Dec 19, 2011

Here is

[Image: p4UeO.png]


Download
http://localhostr.com/file/KAP9z7f/crackme.rar
Virustotal
http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=76afae5256c0745727c49983798ff1d0ce4c95af0a5c8d24ee93950cf62a8337-1324312827



* - (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━━┻ - Dec 19, 2011

Stop obfuscating it, it doesn't proof a single point. I'll be waiting for the unobfuscated version.

* - blackperuvian - Dec 19, 2011

It a simple ofuscation..
I make it because I probably release my app and I need to prove his security
(Dec 19, 2011 09:50 AM)Armadylan Wrote:  Stop obfuscating it, it doesn't proof a single point. I'll be waiting for the unobfuscated version.



* - (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━━┻ - Dec 19, 2011

(Dec 19, 2011 09:52 AM)blackperuvian Wrote:  It a simple ofuscation..
I make it because I probably release my app and I need to prove his security

No, a crackme is supposed to test natural security, not security that anyone can get in 30 seconds by a program.

* - privTech - Dec 19, 2011

i agree, this shouldnt be obfuscated! its pointless! it should be natural

* - (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━━┻ - Dec 19, 2011

(Dec 19, 2011 10:03 AM)priv0te95 Wrote:  i agree, this shouldnt be obfuscated! its pointless! it should be natural

You obfuscated your crackme too. Or you put antis on it, which are both idiotic.

* - privTech - Dec 19, 2011

i put a anti on it for reflector on my .net crack me :) if your moaning about that then you need to grow up? a simple anti is easy as hell to get off.
and as for the other on in this section you need to check it over befor you flame because its not obfuscated as its not .net!

* - (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━━┻ - Dec 19, 2011

(Dec 19, 2011 10:07 AM)priv0te95 Wrote:  i put a anti on it for reflector :) if your moaning about that then you need to grow up? a simple anti is easy as hell to get off.

Tell me the point of adding an anti. It's supposed to be a NATURAL PROTECTION.

* - privTech - Dec 19, 2011

i think you will find that alot of crack me's / logins / auth methods have antis!? like isdebuggerpresent? to stop the lowlife noobs that dont even know how to crack attempting to get through? therefore only people with knowledge can get in! it actually would stop a certain percentage of people getting in

* - Mr.Lazy - Dec 19, 2011

confuser obfuscator used in it...just deobsucated it...looks like easy now...so i am not trying...

* - privTech - Dec 19, 2011

(Dec 19, 2011 09:48 AM)blackperuvian Wrote:  Here is

[Image: p4UeO.png]

What exactly are we aiming for? i have this so far...

[Image: gQK08.png]

[Image: 3DIK1.png]

And it loads this page? but with errors due to the ScriptErrorsSuppressed tag?

Am i correct or do i need to continue further?


* - blackperuvian - Dec 19, 2011

You need. To find
[img]http://choopd.com/?h=a348935ff6804efffae1d65e02df4ff8[/img]

* - 1NV1518L3 - Dec 19, 2011

uhm ?
[img]http://i.lulzimg.com/f3976429bd.png[/img]

* - privTech - Dec 19, 2011

Woooo first person to crack :D good crack me! thanks

This was really good! :)

[Image: 3ABDK.png]

* - blackperuvian - Dec 19, 2011

Cool , what tool you use to deofuscate it or simple olly ...
(Dec 19, 2011 12:00 PM)priv0te95 Wrote:  Woooo first person to crack :D good crack me! thanks

This was really good! :)

[Image: 3ABDK.png]