+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126)
+---- Thread: 2.2 billion MD5 hashes per second anyone? (/showthread.php?tid=2793610)
2.2 billion MD5 hashes per second anyone? - Dogelan - Aug 19, 2012
What happens when you run CUDA BarsWF on a system with a GeForce GTX 670 FTW video card and an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T processor overclocked to 4.0GHz.
Hehehehe. Pretty neat 😎
* - kickerbat - Aug 19, 2012
Hashcat is faster. Also Hashcat hash more methods including salting etc
* - Dogelan - Aug 19, 2012
(Aug 19, 2012 08:28 PM)kickerbat Wrote: Hashcat is faster. Also Hashcat hash more methods including salting etc
Nope.avi
BarsWF uses GPU Acceleration which increases the speed by HOLY SHIT A FUCKTON.
Not only that, but it's far easier to use BarsWF. Hashcat is a fucking struggle to use, and slower ._.
* - hirez - Aug 20, 2012
You live in the stone age? BarsWF is many times slower than hashcat.
Hashcat is GPU accelerated: http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-lite/
* - Dogelan - Aug 20, 2012
(Aug 20, 2012 07:53 AM)hirez Wrote: You live in the stone age? BarsWF is many times slower than hashcat.
Hashcat is GPU accelerated: http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-lite/
Whatever, I just prefer BarsWF.
Thanks.
* - banthex - Aug 20, 2012
Hm. AMD Cards are better for cracking. I have 2 ATI 5850 and i get much more then 2200 Mhash/s with each one. I'm using hashcat.
* - kickerbat - Aug 20, 2012
Moral of the story is, Hashcat. Problem solved.
/close thread