Hack Forums
[Need] 2.6.18-194.32.1 2011 i686 local root exploit - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Grayhat • Purple Team • Hybrid Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=449)
+---- Forum: Website Hacking (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=43)
+---- Thread: [Need] 2.6.18-194.32.1 2011 i686 local root exploit (/showthread.php?tid=3676171)

Pages: Pages 1 2


[Need] 2.6.18-194.32.1 2011 i686 local root exploit - Jack_ - Aug 7, 2013

As the title says I want/need a local root exploit for this version
Code
2.6.18-194.32.1 2011 i686

I have searched for it but I have not found it.


* - Krieg - Aug 7, 2013

http://grsecurity.net/~spender/exploits/enlightenment.tgz
I fucking swear if you come back and tell me there's no compiler on the box I'll stab you in the face 666 times.


* - SoLong - Aug 7, 2013

(Aug 7, 2013 01:35 PM)Krieg Wrote:  http://grsecurity.net/~spender/exploits/enlightenment.tgz
I fucking swear if you come back and tell me there's no compiler on the box I'll stab you in the face 666 times.

There is no compiler on the box :((


* - webcreator - Aug 7, 2013

mmh, maybe i have the solution for u,
contact me in pm


* - n3xus - Aug 7, 2013

(Aug 7, 2013 02:18 PM)SoLong Wrote:  There is no compiler on the box :((

compile them on your own box/vm, then upload them to the box you are trying to own.


* - SoLong - Aug 7, 2013

(Aug 7, 2013 05:07 PM)n3xus Wrote:  compile them on your own box/vm, then upload them to the box you are trying to own.

It was a reply to Krieg's post :D
dirtyfive


* - pashabiceps - Aug 8, 2013

(Aug 7, 2013 05:07 PM)n3xus Wrote:  compile them on your own box/vm, then upload them to the box you are trying to own.

Isn't that rather obvious?

Oh sorry, this is HF.


* - Jack_ - Aug 9, 2013

(Aug 7, 2013 01:35 PM)Krieg Wrote:  http://grsecurity.net/~spender/exploits/enlightenment.tgz
I fucking swear if you come back and tell me there's no compiler on the box I'll stab you in the face 666 times.

I downloaded it and compiled it. When I tried executing the file pwnkernel. I get an error that it cannot execute it the same with the other binaries. Are you sure that is the right exploit? Some of the files on the folder are outdated.


* - Krieg - Aug 9, 2013

Paste the error, please.
If it's "Cannot execute binary file" then you've failed and you need to think about what you've done wrong.
Spoiler (Click to View)


* - Jack_ - Aug 9, 2013

(Aug 9, 2013 10:13 AM)Krieg Wrote:  Paste the error, please.
If it's "Cannot execute binary file" then you've failed and you need to think about what you've done wrong.
Spoiler (Click to View)

That is the error I'm getting. So the exploit is for 64 bit?


* - Krieg - Aug 9, 2013

No. You compiled it on (or for) a 64bit box and are trying to run it on 32bit. This won't work.


* - Jack_ - Aug 12, 2013

I compiled them on a 32 computer and when I try to run the file exploit I get
Code
./exploit: /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by ./exploit)

The pwnkernel didn't work I get
Code
Pulseaudio does not exist!

Does anyone have an idea on how to proceed?


* - Krieg - Aug 12, 2013

You should be running the NON null exploits, anyway...


* - Jack_ - Aug 12, 2013

(Aug 12, 2013 09:53 AM)Krieg Wrote:  You should be running the NON null exploits, anyway...

That is what I'm doing and I get the following error
Code
./exploit: /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by ./exploit)

The second error is for the null exploits.


* - Krieg - Aug 12, 2013

Code
./exploit: /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by ./exploit)
This is saying that you compiled for a newer version of GlibC than is available on the target system.
You need to link the executable to older glibc functions, or compile it with the -static flag.