Hack Forums
Backend Resolving Service | Reveal True Backend IP Addresses | Works On ANY Website - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Premium (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=451)
+---- Forum: Premium Sellers Section (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=107)
+---- Thread: Backend Resolving Service | Reveal True Backend IP Addresses | Works On ANY Website (/showthread.php?tid=4033632)

Pages: Pages 1 2 3


Backend Resolving Service | Reveal True Backend IP Addresses | Works On ANY Website - regexks_ - Jan 31, 2014

I can resolve the backend IP addresses of servers hiding behind Cloudflare and any commercially or non-commercially available reverse proxy using conventional methods. I will also use non-conventional methods in case conventional methods fail.

I will normally provide the backend IP address within 24 hours of receiving the domain in question. I also have a near 100% success rate.

Price: $25/domain

I accept PayPal and BTC.

XMPP: [email protected]



* - SiteKiller - Feb 1, 2014

hi - this looks awesome

are there any vouch copies going? I coukd use a service like this.


* - Angel Beatsβ€Œβ€Œ - Feb 1, 2014

Do your methods include SEing?

If they do I know this method :P


* - Tastylicous - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 01:58 AM)AdditionX Wrote:  Thanks! Im Providing A Free one here :).
http://www.cloudflare-watch.org/cfs.html

Free and not working, now stop hijacking threads!


* - regexks_ - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 01:56 AM)Snapchat Wrote:  Do your methods include SEing?

If they do I know this method :P

No. My methods include testing for common misconfigurations, some bruteforcing and very wide internet scans.

I'm not trying to release my methods but that's the gist of it.


* - Vicellus Drum - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 03:26 AM)regexks_ Wrote:  No. My methods include testing for common misconfigurations, some bruteforcing and very wide internet scans.

I'm not trying to release my methods but that's the gist of it.

So searching for common unprotected subdomains, and googling the website's old IP records isn't a part of your method? 😏


* - regexks_ - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 03:35 AM)Vicellus Drum Wrote:  So searching for common unprotected subdomains, and googling the website's old IP records isn't a part of your method? 😏

That's what Fierce is for. My private methods involve HTTP/1.1 requests to the entirety of the internet.


* - Vicellus Drum - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 03:42 AM)regexks_ Wrote:  That's what Fierce is for. My private methods involve HTTP/1.1 requests to the entirety of the internet.

So basically you've got a giant database of the entire internet requesting data at random times? Interesting


* - regexks_ - Feb 1, 2014

(Feb 1, 2014 03:44 AM)Vicellus Drum Wrote:  So basically you've got a giant database of the entire internet requesting data at random times? Interesting

No, I've got port 80 enumerated (port scan). I send a GET request for / from every single host on that list. If it responds with the right page, it's your target.


* - ComponY - Feb 6, 2014

Vouch for Regex. He's always selling good services, and products. Never fails to satisfy me.


* - regexks_ - Feb 7, 2014

(Feb 6, 2014 10:21 PM)ComponY Wrote:  Vouch for Regex. He's always selling good services, and products. Never fails to satisfy me.

Thank you for the vouch 🀝

Available for any requests at this time.


* - T3h Hack3r - Feb 7, 2014

Vouch for regexks_ and the uniqueness of this methodology compared to other services offered on hackforums.


* - The Invoker - Feb 7, 2014

Regex, the scanner is public bro.

You choose Title Name , and you can IP Ranges .....


* - SharePro - Feb 7, 2014

I guess a safe doesn't sell security - rather instead time - question is how much time :)


* - regexks_ - Feb 7, 2014

(Feb 7, 2014 04:47 AM)BitchGotRaped Wrote:  Regex, the scanner is public bro.

You choose Title Name , and you can IP Ranges .....

Why do you always insist that my shit is public...

I can assure you that it isn't.