![]() |
|
[.NET] Another Cracker Source (Addmefast + Parses Points) (Console) - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [.NET] Another Cracker Source (Addmefast + Parses Points) (Console) (/showthread.php?tid=4579728) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
Another Cracker Source (Addmefast + Parses Points) (Console) - Mr. Carter - Dec 11, 2014 Well some guy asked me to code an cracker for him, I just decided to drop an cracker example. Tho making it a console was a simplier job, so I didn't bother doing a form, you can yourself convert it into forms but works like this aswell. Heres a screenshot, ![]() Download, Code https://www.sendspace.com/file/ndk0iior Pastebin, Code http://pastebin.com/2Kq97Qr6I'm also new to parsing, but that way it works aswell. * - Hiiro - Dec 11, 2014 Is this a bruteforcer for AddMeFast? * - LynS - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 11:15 AM)Austrix Wrote: Is this a bruteforcer for AddMeFast? By Seeing The Code I Can Tell That It Is AddMeFast Bruteforcer :) * - Mr. Carter - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 11:15 AM)Austrix Wrote: Is this a bruteforcer for AddMeFast? Yeah, tho not multithreaded but works really fast with 1 thread only aswell. * - LynS - Dec 11, 2014 What Is The Rate Of Attempt Per Seconds ? * - borisganji1 - Dec 11, 2014 Thanks for the source man, this is a nice read. Regards * - Robert Downey Jr - Dec 11, 2014 this isnt a bruteforcer you n00bs. It checks email:pass list. Thanks OP * - Mr. Carter - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 01:19 PM)Robert Downey Jr Wrote: this isnt a bruteforcer you n00bs. It checks email:pass list. Thanks OP o.o Well you can actually call it bruteforcer, but for me I need to add proxies for it to work, I might update it at somepoint. * - nathan72389 - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 01:49 PM)Mr. Carter Wrote: o.o Well you can actually call it bruteforcer, but for me I need to add proxies for it to work, I might update it at somepoint. you can NOT call it a bruteforcer because it is not one. Period! if you think this is even close to a brutforcer, then you need to go read a little about what you think a bruteforcer is. * - Hire - Dec 11, 2014 Thanks for sharing OP, nice program. * - Nivarka - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 02:31 PM)nathan72389 Wrote: you can NOT call it a bruteforcer because it is not one. Period! It could easily become a bruteforcer, however. Simply stop it from checking the passwords listed in the .txt file, and just check the username against a random wordlist. * - nathan72389 - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 02:59 PM)Nivarka Wrote: It could easily become a bruteforcer, however. thats not even a bruteforcer. damn! ppl please! learn the difference between a dictionary attack and a brute force attack * - SIM-1676753 - Dec 11, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 02:59 PM)Nivarka Wrote: It could easily become a bruteforcer, however. "Brute Force Attack: Attempts to determine a secret by trying every possible combination. Dictionary Attack: Typically, a guessing attack which uses precompiled list of options. Rather then trying every option, only try complete options which are likely to work." http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/67712/what-are-the-differences-between-dictionary-attack-and-brute-force-attack * - Invicta - Dec 11, 2014 Code Control.CheckForIllegalCrossThreadCalls = FalseReally? * - Nivarka - Dec 12, 2014 (Dec 11, 2014 04:55 PM)Mr. Trvp Wrote: "Brute Force Attack: Attempts to determine a secret by trying every possible combination. In which case a dictionary atack is far superior and more likely to work in the majority of cases. |