![]() |
|
[.NET] [Basic] Native - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [.NET] [Basic] Native (/showthread.php?tid=4661820) |
[Basic] Native - KingDeath360 - Jan 30, 2015 I made this project for 2 reasons. To make C++ cross platform and to make it harder for VB.NET apps to get decompiled But just forget about the first reason.. Some of you may find this useful some wont ![]() Currently supports: [+]Strings [+]Console.WriteLine( String) [+]Console.ReadLine() VB.NET side, download: (Atom) Code MoAJn2gtbDwa0m0mOxLB+IH5nxcqnIHsOxTa+Dc6KjTuKm130jTq+oHthttp://www.filedropper.com/ctovb tl;dr; Converts some VB to C++, makes it harder to decompile * - Ninja - Jan 30, 2015 We can just use obfuscators to protect our files and prevent decompiling. Nonetheless good work though! * - pgorangeman - Jan 30, 2015 Very good work sir, nicely done, i like * - KingDeath360 - Jan 30, 2015 (Jan 30, 2015 09:12 AM)Tyranitar Wrote: We can just use obfuscators to protect our files and prevent decompiling. Nonetheless good work though! Please refer to this thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=2189273 to quote: Code 1. The JIT in .net is too easy to hook to get the code 100% backtl;dr; .net obfuscater's don't work, We need a new solution * - iamskid - Jan 30, 2015 (Jan 30, 2015 09:48 AM)KingDeath360 Wrote: Please refer to this thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=2189273 lelelelelelelelelel. VirtualNet is a mini .NET framework. * - DisguiserNET - Jan 30, 2015 (Jan 30, 2015 09:48 AM)KingDeath360 Wrote: Please refer to this thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=21892731. Jit can be hooked, but so can the obfuscator as well. 2. talking about deobfuscators but didnt named a single one: reflector and sae are decompilers although sae has a small deobfuscator build in. 3. nope, fyi try to unpack confuserex and tell me how easy it is |