![]() |
|
[ULTIMATE] Free Large E-Whoring Pack! [IMAGES] - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Money (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=241) +--- Forum: Adult Content Management (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=170) +--- Thread: [ULTIMATE] Free Large E-Whoring Pack! [IMAGES] (/showthread.php?tid=474354) |
[ULTIMATE] Free Large E-Whoring Pack! [IMAGES] - BigG - Jun 11, 2010 [DELETED] * - Erudite - Jun 11, 2010 You would have a hard task using most of them, as they are infamous/ way to professional/unbelievable, appreciate the share but you need genuine girls. Not massive boobed late 20 something. It just doesn't word with the skeptical nature of the target audience. * - BigG - Jun 11, 2010 (Jun 11, 2010 11:04 AM)James2h Wrote: You would have a hard task using most of them, as they are infamous/ way to professional/unbelievable, appreciate the share but you need genuine girls. Not massive boobed late 20 something. It just doesn't word with the skeptical nature of the target audience. I don't agree. Most of these images are in fact very believable, specially with horny guys; no fake boobed pornstars here. All of them are girls with phone-picture (with mirrors) / in their room. But yeah I put the sexiest ones in the previews, but I'll add some (even) more 'believable' ones. Thanks for your feedback :D * - Erudite - Jun 11, 2010 No problem not trying to be harsh but the majority, just don't look feasible.... If they are too decent looking it arouses the question in most, why are you on this chatroom? And given that I have seen several of those in other packs, they have been touted way too much making them hard to use. However maybe for some newbies it was a good share personally I won't be using * - BigG - Jun 11, 2010 (Jun 11, 2010 11:20 AM)James2h Wrote: No problem not trying to be harsh but the majority, just don't look feasible.... If they are too decent looking it arouses the question in most, why are you on this chatroom? And given that I have seen several of those in other packs, they have been touted way too much making them hard to use. However maybe for some newbies it was a good share personally I won't be using Trust me, horny men in chatrooms don't think like that. * - Erudite - Jun 11, 2010 Dude, I sure I have been a lot more successful and more experienced at social engineering guys... Check my tutorial, don't talk to me as i'm a skiddie who doesn't understand their behavioural habits. Yes if you are after nothing, maybe they will accept its you. But if your looking for 50-60 pounds like I do , I can assure you a majority of them photos are useless.. for MORE experienced social engineerers... * - BigG - Jun 11, 2010 I have added a "+trustworthy" category. * - 2b7 - Jun 11, 2010 dude you honestly need +rep although I can't help you there ... thanks for sharing * - gormo4 - Jun 12, 2010 (Jun 11, 2010 11:08 AM)slayerboy Wrote: I don't agree. Most of these images are in fact very believable, specially with horny guys; no fake boobed pornstars here. All of them are girls with phone-picture (with mirrors) / in their room. But yeah I put the sexiest ones in the previews, but I'll add some (even) more 'believable' ones. Agree- they appear to be very 'amateur' photographs :) and older women sometimes get bored and go on chatrooms and so on 👍 I think.. do they?❓ * - ooooooooooooooooooooooooo - Jun 12, 2010 Thanks my friend! If I could I would give you +1 rep! * - MrPeriPeri - Jun 12, 2010 Nice share bro, thanks 👍 * - BigG - Jun 13, 2010 Glad you like it. Feedback is always appreciated 😉 * - Ben. - Jun 13, 2010 whats with the other stuff * - BigG - Jun 13, 2010 (Jun 13, 2010 07:58 AM)XTC Remiix Wrote: whats with the other stuff What other stuff? ///tooooshotrrtrt * - Crayon - Jun 14, 2010 Have downloaded. All working fine. If I WAS a pedo going to buy pictures and shit... I would be thinking these were legit. SHARING IS CARING <3 |