Hack Forums
[Beta Release] TESTERS NEEDED | tintCrypter v2 Progress Thread | Changes | Suggestions - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Bazaar (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=450)
+---- Forum: Marketplace Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=163)
+---- Thread: [Beta Release] TESTERS NEEDED | tintCrypter v2 Progress Thread | Changes | Suggestions (/showthread.php?tid=4819957)

Pages: Pages 1 2

TESTERS NEEDED | tintCrypter v2 Progress Thread | Changes | Suggestions - debug - May 13, 2015

Need a few testers. PM me.

Hey all,

This thread will serve as the progress thread for the work I'm doing towards tintCrypter v2. This will mainly server to inform current customers or potential customers who may have feedback and or suggestions.

tintCrypter v2 GUI
[Image: nwj8Evz.png]

What's new?
  • Near-complete recode

  • Manage Settings (Save/load)

  • Avast! DeepScreen bypass. (Doesn't require any options to be enabled.)

  • Improved hidden startup method w/ customizable options

  • Improved process persistence

  • Run MessageBox once

  • Test messagebox

  • Automatically scan after compilation

  • Help section - answers FAQ's

  • Incredibly secure client. If anyone feels they can crack it, PM me. (NOTE: This isn't just some netseal + variables.)



What's left to do
  • Improve USG - Make it more randomized, hopefully thwart quick ESET detections.

  • Further improve process persistence (prevent process closure)

  • More binder options (custom file name if dropped)

  • Stability and bug testing. (Always being done, but final process needs to be done at the end)

  • ??



I'm asking you all, preferably current customers or potential future clients, to suggest to me options that you want added or think would be useful. Keyword: useful. Please don't suggest garbage options, or "lol .net is shit gtfo."

I'm looking for serious replies only.
Thank you,
debug

* - Dulio - May 13, 2015

Well what is the stub coded in?
VB.NET?

* - debug - May 13, 2015

(May 13, 2015 07:29 PM)Psycho‎ Wrote:  Well what is the stub coded in?
VB.NET?
It's coded in c#. But yes they are compiled essentially the same.

* - DuguWudi - May 14, 2015

Is there antikill feature, eg when someone kill it, it prompt access denied/etc

and will there be a antisuspend feature?

Dont to forget system wide injection?

Thanks.

* - Raymond Reddington - May 14, 2015

Looks like a great Crypter. I will watch out for this one.

* - debug - May 14, 2015

Antikill is technically process persistence, but the access denied prompt requires admin so I will probably not add that.
I had systemwide injection but it was buggy. I will see about bringing it back.
Probably won't be an anti suspend feature simply because I don't see that as being an issue all that often, and would likely cause more problems than it fixes.

* - stdio - May 14, 2015

What's the injection routine like?

Incredibly secure client. If anyone feels they can crack it, PM me.

Probably some joke bruteforce routine which can easily be dumped from memory.

Further improve process persistence (prevent process closure)

Have fun doing this in .NET

* - xeonx - May 14, 2015

Got any eta on release date? I've heard some positive feedback on v1 :)

Let me now if you need any beta testes/vouch copy :)

* - OfficialNutty - May 14, 2015

Interested on the ETA on the release date.

* - debug - May 14, 2015

(May 14, 2015 12:11 PM)stdio Wrote:  What's the injection routine like?

Incredibly secure client. If anyone feels they can crack it, PM me.

Probably some joke bruteforce routine which can easily be dumped from memory.

Further improve process persistence (prevent process closure)

Have fun doing this in .NET
The injection used is self-injection.

Not "joke bruteforce." And no, cannot be dumped from memory.

As for an ETA, I don't really like to say because if I don't meet that date it's disappointing for everyone involved.

* - DuguWudi - May 14, 2015

(May 14, 2015 11:45 AM)debug Wrote:  Antikill is technically process persistence, but the access denied prompt requires admin so I will probably not add that.
I had systemwide injection but it was buggy. I will see about bringing it back.
Probably won't be an anti suspend feature simply because I don't see that as being an issue all that often, and would likely cause more problems than it fixes.

Thanks for the information, so now I only got two product choices for antisuspend feature, one is already in market and one still haven't even in market yet. Anyway, thank you.

* - debug - May 20, 2015

Need a couple beta testers. Upgraded members only.

* - KillαMuvz - May 20, 2015

(May 14, 2015 06:24 PM)DuguWudi Wrote:  Thanks for the information, so now I only got two product choices for antisuspend feature, one is already in market and one still haven't even in market yet. Anyway, thank you.

Anti suspend is not useless. Cryptex uses it in ones of the types of persistence.
Just manage it carefully and it will work wonders.

* - DuguWudi - May 20, 2015

(May 20, 2015 06:29 PM)KillαMuvz Wrote:  Anti suspend is not useless. Cryptex uses it in ones of the types of persistence.
Just manage it carefully and it will work wonders.

I didn't notice Cryptex have antisuspend feature.

Can show a video of it in action?

Thank you.

* - debug - May 20, 2015

(May 20, 2015 06:41 PM)DuguWudi Wrote:  I didn't notice Cryptex have antisuspend feature.

Can show a video of it in action?

Thank you.
As killamuvz advised me, I will be adding anti-suspend within the persistence as well.