![]() |
|
[RELEASE] Rip amp list release. - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Botnets and Botting (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=92) +---- Thread: [RELEASE] Rip amp list release. (/showthread.php?tid=5073052) |
[RELEASE] Rip amp list release. - SimoxFX - Nov 27, 2015 Helo everyone, Today I will release my rip amp list + tests (1gbps spoof server). For scripts go here: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4902345 List: http://pastebin.com/bWwRLZz5 Hit test: http://prntscr.com/97nn0q 200-300mbps / 550000-600000pps For more info, skype: saymon2266 At some as possible i release more private list. 🤝 Thanks to Zoom for attack + scanner. Bye.. 🎉 * - PLT - Nov 27, 2015 Code 192.154.62.112 488* - ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ - Nov 27, 2015 why do people think thats gonna test the list out lmao * - SimoxFX - Nov 27, 2015 Is short list xD sorry, but hit very hard. * - Hoodie+ - Nov 27, 2015 Interesting list... 😖 * - Knowledgeable - Nov 27, 2015 (Nov 27, 2015 12:30 PM)PLT Wrote: Yup, rip scans produce about 100 actually different servers now (if you scan 500) so an unfiltered list gets a Lot of dupes. Also, using 800 threads, wtf. * - SimoxFX - Nov 27, 2015 (Nov 27, 2015 02:23 PM)Knowledgeable Wrote: Yup, rip scans produce about 100 actually different servers now (if you scan 500) so an unfiltered list gets a Lot of dupes.Yep, becouse is fast. (Nov 27, 2015 02:15 PM)Lazar_ Wrote: Interesting list... 😖Thank u :D * - Jаson - Nov 27, 2015 RIP is shit. pls stop using it * - SimoxFX - Nov 27, 2015 (Nov 27, 2015 03:03 PM)Zoom Wrote: RIP is shit. pls stop using itWhy? * - Knowledgeable - Nov 27, 2015 (Nov 27, 2015 02:48 PM)SimoxFX Wrote: Yep, becouse is fast. yeah but 800 threads is very unrealistic and unnecessary. you shouldn't be trying to push 800 threads js. if your server and host are allowing it, assuming you're using contabo, i still couldn't think you'd get any better results than a lower number. could i be wrong, certainly, im just discussing * - SimoxFX - Nov 27, 2015 (Nov 27, 2015 04:03 PM)Knowledgeable Wrote: yeah but 800 threads is very unrealistic and unnecessary.ok, thank u, and i don't use contabo. * - Apple J4ck. - Nov 27, 2015 This is simply awful, why would you even publish that? |