![]() |
|
[Java] Password Extractor for Chrome - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [Java] Password Extractor for Chrome (/showthread.php?tid=5211536) |
Password Extractor for Chrome - xxm0dzxx - Mar 22, 2016 heres a quick program I made to extract passwords from chrome: Code package atleast.there.are.packages; //.and.commentsit requires sqlite-jdbc, apache commons-io, and jna. right now all it does is print login info and the URL its from but you can easily make it send/save it somewhere example output: Code Info for https://my.freenom.com/clientarea.php / https://my.freenom.com/dologin.phpNOTE: Crypt32Util.cryptUnprotectData only works on the computer the passwords were saved on * - TopDawgIO - Mar 22, 2016 Very nice, I was looking at USB password stealers a few days ago. But i could run this and simply spoof the result to myemail address.. Thanks for sharing :) * - feddielopez1980 - Mar 28, 2016 Hey guys this looks a cool tool but what do i save the code as would it .jar I am sorry I don't know much about it but i am interested * - Dаedalus - Mar 28, 2016 I wouldn't even bother going as far as to save it as a jar, I would just save it as a .java then: javac YOURCLASSNAME Code java -classpath ".;io.jar;jna.jar;platform.jar;sqlite.jar" YOUCLASSNAMEHEREYou also have to have apache io, jna, jna-platform, and sqlite. Download all of those JAR's, and put them in the same file as your class. Make sure you also add them as External Libraries to your project. Sorry if any of this doesn't make sense, I'm very new to java. * - Sogomn - Mar 29, 2016 Thanks for sharing! Looks like Chrome's entire password security is based on CryptProtectData. 🤣 * - Reece Morgan - Mar 30, 2016 (Mar 28, 2016 06:48 PM)Neal George Caffrey Wrote: I wouldn't even bother going as far as to save it as a jar, I would just save it as a .java then: The reason you'd package it as a jar is so that you can release it as a standalone program (i.e, without dependencies). Would you rather have 1 file or 10? Just make it a jar and be done with it, no reason not to. * - Sogomn - Mar 30, 2016 (Mar 30, 2016 12:45 AM)Reece Morgan Wrote: (i.e, without dependencies) It still requires Java. Dependencies are the same. The only difference is the file size and that you can start it by a regular double click (if it contains the proper manifest). * - Reece Morgan - Mar 30, 2016 (Mar 30, 2016 03:44 AM)Sogomn Wrote: It still requires Java. Dependencies are the same. The only difference is the file size and that you can start it by a regular double click (if it contains the proper manifest). It will still require Java, but the end-user won't have to download all of the dependencies or run from the command line. It's all around neater and more efficient for the end-user. * - robby_j - Apr 5, 2016 Nice job man, I like it. I guess packing things up to make it easier for the end user is the next step. Not really needed though, it's perfect how it is, thanks! |