![]() |
|
[Python] [Source] Google Chrome Password Stealer - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [Python] [Source] Google Chrome Password Stealer (/showthread.php?tid=5269887) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
[Source] Google Chrome Password Stealer - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 15, 2016 For Actual Coders/Programmers Hello to for all of those pythonista's out there, a hardy function to return passwords from a chromium based browsers. This is simply a function, no retarded print statements, allowing for code reuse in an project. Tell you, malware analysts are correct when they say most hackers cant code for shit. I have seen many 'interpretations' of late (not naming names), however i find them to be poorly written, and will fail in most cases. They do not cover Chromium based installs (many companies including AV outfits like to roll their on chromium build, mostly they do not change decryption routine.), or handle non-windows platforms. (This code is yet to handle decryption for nix) This function does require passing the platform to it, however it then deals with the correct paths from there. I believe any good programmer would agree that each function should handle a clear defined problem. I will be working on a ctypes interpretation of win32decrypt as a @TheHojack has pointed out, this should allow for less dependencies. PHP Code * - SIM-1866423 - May 15, 2016 Did you see this issue?, https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5239440 * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 15, 2016 (May 15, 2016 04:53 AM)b3mb4m Wrote: Did you see this issue?, Yes i did indeed :D , i believe my post states the differences between the two. * - Walt Disney™ - May 15, 2016 This looks interesting. I'm going to save the code to look at later. Have been learning from sources lately. Thanks. * - TheKojak - May 15, 2016 (May 15, 2016 02:58 AM)0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 Wrote: I will be working on a ctypes interpretation of win32decrypt as a @TheHojack has pointed out, this should allow for less dependencies. Lol. Thanks for crediting me... TheKojak Wrote: I don't like the heavy use of the pywin32 module, especially for such trivial tasks which could be easily created in pure ctypes. Using win32crypt, win32api, and win32file adds ~300kb of dependencies. * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 15, 2016 (May 15, 2016 01:53 PM)TheKojak Wrote: Lol. Thanks for crediting me... Couldn't agree more though, less dependencies, the better. Fuck the expression 'dont re-invent the wheel' how else are you supposed to learn. The only even-cleaner method would be to somehow implement the decryption function entirely, using the same inputs as the Kernel, difficult, but would avoid any API hooking/monitoring. * - UberUnicorn - May 16, 2016 Just send the encrypted passwords to your computer and then decrypt them on your end. * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 16, 2016 I would usually agree with server side decryption, however in this case of using the win32decrypt function, the key and salt are derived from unique values to that user, so if the data is exfiltrated first, it would be unable to decrypt. For security, i could suggest re-encrypting the passwords with DH or maybe AES for transmission. * - @beef - May 17, 2016 Did you decide to just copy my thread? or? (May 16, 2016 06:54 AM)UberUnicorn Wrote: Just send the encrypted passwords to your computer and then decrypt them on your end. Let me explain in a less complex way. You can't decrypt the passwords on your computer because it's like taking the key from your grandmothers door and trying to use it in your your door lol.. it just won't work. However you can decrypt on their pc then send it to yourself decrypted. * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 17, 2016 (May 17, 2016 12:28 AM)@beef Wrote: Did you decide to just copy my thread? or? I tried not to do this... Read my thread again... * - @beef - May 17, 2016 (May 17, 2016 12:41 AM)0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 Wrote: I tried not to do this... I didn't read it the first time sorry but you must have gotten the idea from my thread lol? It's practically the same concept. * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 17, 2016 Not i'm afraid. I first wrote this code last year. I used it for my own purposes in a few different projects etc. I decided to release my code to HF when i saw yours... and namely the way you dealt with people who decided to offer suggestions. I decided to to combat that in ways twofold: release a reusable function that is modular and can be re-purposed for any purpose, and to offer a line of support etc, in which I may be slightly nicer. I don't mean to offend, honestly :D ; and tried to avoid saying any of this, but i found it audacious that you would offer mediocre code, take advice/suggestions very poorly and offer wrong/poor advice. Check my post about reversing "FUD" python exe's: hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5270367 On another note, respect for your code release bro, honestly. Just don't shove it down peoples throats, were supposed to be a community here, no matter how annoying skids may be. I'm all for a "gentrification"(lol) of HF. * - @beef - May 17, 2016 So you decided to make this thread to counter my code lool and holy shit. It's free code.. it's not going to be the 10/10 fucking best new thing. Most of the people on my thread were crying. about the code when they couldn't even take the source and improve it themselves. Where is my "poor advice"? lol. You're still quite new to the forum. You shouldn't get so full of yourself bro. Free code isn't going to be the best thing ever. Gl with your "support" lol. I've had a shit ton of people adding me on Skype for help and I've helped every single one? tf * - Cats00n - May 17, 2016 Hey man, looks awesome :) side note: I added the code tag to my post, I would PM you, but I don't have enough posts yet. * - 0x52-0x75-0x64-0x79 - May 17, 2016 (Apr 17, 2016 12:33 PM)@beef Wrote: You should really use your brain next time lol.Yeah... real nice... (Apr 17, 2016 01:20 PM)@beef Wrote: k stop talking about stuff you know nothing aboutyet again... just a suggestion of sockets (Apr 20, 2016 10:46 PM)@beef Wrote: It's not lmao because when you compile it then its FUD. Plain wrong... As for skype, i can say nothing, i'm sure you have given valuable support to users, so in a sense, i apologise. I never meant any disrespect, and tried to avoid all this. Even If i was new to this forum, what would it matter, since when should my length of time on a forum dictate my actual skill? It's these sort of attitudes that have brought HF to where it is today... -_- Bottom Line I have respect for you and for anyone who actively goes out and contributes to HF, but i am tired, and even somewhat depressed at the state of this place. I remember HF in an older time where threads/users/content were of a much higher quality. HF is a tool and community that could be utilized to be something really awesome. Dealing with the skids by abusive means is not the way to go bro. Rant over |