Hack Forums
[Python] Gmail Account Cracker - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151)
+---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118)
+---- Thread: [Python] Gmail Account Cracker (/showthread.php?tid=5285917)

Pages: Pages 1 2


Gmail Account Cracker - █BORNE█ - May 29, 2016

I created this today and am realsing it to get some feedback on what else could be added. I will probalaly make it work with a wordlist instead of a list within the source.

Source Code (Pastebin)


Thanks for reading😎



* - Sta.ze - May 29, 2016

What annoys me the most is people not knowing the difference between dictionary attack and bruteforcing.

Dictionary attacks use passwords already made. for example from a word list.

bruteforcing goes through all possible characters until it finds one. for example
Code
aaaa
aaab
aaac
...
bbbb
bbba
bbbc
bbbd

you see what it is.

Nice release though 🤝


* - @beef - May 29, 2016

(May 29, 2016 03:54 PM)Captain GreenBean Wrote:  What annoys me the most is people not knowing the difference between dictionary attack and bruteforcing.

Dictionary attacks use passwords already made. for example from a word list.

bruteforcing goes through all possible characters until it finds one. for example
Code
aaaa
aaab
aaac
...
bbbb
bbba
bbbc
bbbd

you see what it is.

Nice release though 🤝

He never said it was either? wtf are you talking about lol? He said he had a list in his code. I'm sure he knows it's a dictionary attack.


* - █BORNE█ - May 30, 2016

I knows its not a brute force... thanks for the feedback you two!


* - afeck_berger - May 30, 2016

you can add to this script rockyou.txt or another pass list thank


* - Bottledcle - Jun 6, 2016

(May 29, 2016 11:15 PM)@beef Wrote:  He never said it was either? wtf are you talking about lol? He said he had a list in his code. I'm sure he knows it's a dictionary attack.

Well the function is called "bruteForce", what it does has nothing to do with brute force.


* - █BORNE█ - Jun 6, 2016

(Jun 6, 2016 08:35 PM)Bottledcle Wrote:  Well the function is called "bruteForce", what it does has nothing to do with brute force.

I just called the function a random name lol.


* - Anymore - Jun 7, 2016

Nice, just add a " Break" after found the correct password.
Code
if msg.smtp_code == 534:
    print('[534] Password correct email verification is enabled (%s)' %password)
    break

You save some time.


* - █BORNE█ - Jun 7, 2016

(Jun 7, 2016 04:14 AM)Anymore Wrote:  Nice, just add a " Break" after found the correct password.
Code
if msg.smtp_code == 534:
    print('[534] Password correct email verification is enabled (%s)' %password)
    break

You save some time.

Oh yes, I forgot!

Thank you


* - Dawn - Jun 7, 2016

Nice release, code looks correct. Been tested???


* - █BORNE█ - Jun 7, 2016

(Jun 7, 2016 11:29 AM)Hypnotic Wrote:  Nice release, code looks correct. Been tested???

Yes it is fully working... I should really make it more stable and add more to it


* - Anymore - Jun 7, 2016

(Jun 7, 2016 11:29 AM)Hypnotic Wrote:  Nice release, code looks correct. Been tested???
Yes i test it, and work, one things i wish add to it is a proxy connection, cause in the email of google, talking about the location of the IP, give to you time and location ( like " 12:00 UK time )


* - █BORNE█ - Jun 7, 2016

(Jun 7, 2016 12:52 PM)Anymore Wrote:  Yes i test it, and work, one things i wish add to it is a proxy connection, cause in the email of google, talking about the location of the IP, give to you time and location ( like " 12:00 UK time )

Thank you for your post


* - WolfNero - Jun 8, 2016

Don't you need proxies to prevent captchas which can give self positives?


* - Agent Raigar - Jun 8, 2016

Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you need to have "Less secure applications" enabled on your Google account in order it to work? If the account you're trying to crack doesn't have it enabled, this is not gonna work, AFAIK