Hack Forums
MindBreaker Obfuscator | .NET Protecting Service | Many Features!! - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Premium (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=451)
+---- Forum: Cryptography and Encryption Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=299)
+---- Thread: MindBreaker Obfuscator | .NET Protecting Service | Many Features!! (/showthread.php?tid=5542001)



MindBreaker Obfuscator | .NET Protecting Service | Many Features!! - SIM-2762393 - Feb 3, 2017

Note : I am not selling the obfuscator i will just obfuscate the files for you for a price.


I can ensure you that this obfuscator will break the mind of anyone trying to reverse engineer your software. I have never sold any obfuscations yet but trust me it will be such a pain in the butt for anyone who tries to crack it.

There is a lot of options to select, Check it now!


Spoiler (Click to View)

Anti Debug
2 Types of Control Flow Obfuscation (Can be used together)
Invalid Metadata (Doesn't work if Fake Native is used)
Fake native stub (Doesn't work if Invalid Metadata is used)
Rename module
Module flood protection
Anti ILDasm
Anti Tamper
Constants protection
Anti Dump
Disintegrate constants
Junk codes
2 Types of Reference proxy protection (Can be used together)
Renaming
And finally Stack Underflow Confusion


Of course no one wants to pay for a bad obfuscating service so i am making sure that you are fine with the protection before buying so here is a sample!
Spoiler (Click to View)


Prices: Payment only in Bitcoin (50% discount for first 10 customers!)

$10 per obfuscation - discount = $5

There is also a subscription which gives you unlimited obfuscations for a time length

$35 per 10 days - discount = $17.5

There will be 2 vouch obfuscations and it will be only for l33t and ub3r. Don't expect me to give the vouch obfuscations today since it is already 12 AM here and i will go to sleep
now.

Edit : I'm online now!

If you got any question about this service or want to buy PM me!




* - Raymond - Feb 4, 2017

Grasp the detailed review.


* - ForceJew - Feb 4, 2017

Saw the guys obfusction pretty awesome!
vouching:)


* - Aristocles - Feb 4, 2017

Stack Underflow is c/p from Confuser, allegedly. Post a crackme so we can see how 'strong' is it :)

edit : it's cleary Ben Mehnni's obfuscator, which is basically former free NETGuard version. Congrats, mrtifa12.

It's clearly overpriced, sloppy and shady. Good Luck, nonetheless.


* - FiftyTwo - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 06:21 AM).NETGuard Wrote:  Stack Underflow is c/p from Confuser, allegedly. Post a crackme so we can see how 'strong' is it :)

This; post the download link (with a virus scan) to a program which has been obfuscated by you (put the title as your HF name or something to prove it's yours). People who have experience in reverse engineering can then attempt to crack your code to see how strong your obfuscator is.


* - SIM-2762393 - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 06:21 AM).NETGuard Wrote:  Stack Underflow is c/p from Confuser, allegedly. Post a crackme so we can see how 'strong' is it :)

edit : it's cleary Ben Mehnni's obfuscator, which is basically former free NETGuard version. Congrats, mrtifa12.

It's clearly overpriced, sloppy and shady. Good Luck, nonetheless.
It's a modified version of a obfuscator and it's not Ben's obfuscator + I got permission from the owner.
And based on what you saying that it is the former "free" NETGuard version? your damn obfuscators got a lot of tutorials on how to deobfuscate some of the options which are :

Native shield and anti-tamper, Strings, ctflow and reference proxy and calli and since you are saying that it is the free version of NETGuard deobfuscate it then please. and about li0n's obfuscator, it was $400 i think for lifetime. i dont see that you were rude with him and telling him that it is overpriced as u are doing now, or it is just because you hacked his servers and stole his obfuscator so you are not saying anything about it?


* - Aristocles - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 06:46 AM)MindBreaker Wrote:  It's a modified version of a obfuscator and it's not Ben's obfuscator + I got permission from the owner.
And based on what you saying that it is the former "free" NETGuard version? your damn obfuscators got a lot of tutorials on how to deobfuscate some of the options which are :

Native shield and anti-tamper, Strings, ctflow and reference proxy and calli and since you are saying that it is the free version of NETGuard deobfuscate it then please

You don't even know your own product, that's a shame... your behaviour only underlines what I thought, though.

I first build NETGuard publicly over Github, then Ben has came and compiled it, modded it and sold it, then NETGuard went to closed-source.
Your product IS Ben protector, you can't lie, neither to me or your customers. That's how it is base on the free version of NETGuard.

1] The former 'BenMenni' watermark in the table name is only partially removed https://i.imgur.com/Ae4Quzv.png
2] You confessed it IS ben protector, yet on this thread you said it was not ? https://gyazo.com/d7a2e736059f8becb1b0ecb3112216f6

About tutorials, well as from today none of them works, and they only allow me to infer that my product has more potential than yours, but
that's a little bit out wide of the purpose here.


* - SIM-2762393 - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 06:30 AM)FiftyTwo Wrote:  This; post the download link (with a virus scan) to a program which has been obfuscated by you (put the title as your HF name or something to prove it's yours). People who have experience in reverse engineering can then attempt to crack your code to see how strong your obfuscator is.
There was already a link and a VT in the thread but u wanted my name on it so here it is again

Spoiler (Click to View)


(Feb 4, 2017 07:07 AM).NETGuard Wrote:  1] The former 'BenMenni' watermark in the table name is only partially removed https://i.imgur.com/Ae4Quzv.png
2] You confessed it IS ben protector, yet on this thread you said it was not ? https://gyazo.com/d7a2e736059f8becb1b0ecb3112216f6
If u read the last thing i said u would see that it's not ([8:47 AM] RE Noob: Well it's not Ben's obfuscator) and check the new sample i provided and compare it with ben's protector, + thats bMind not benmhenni -_-

Edit : Go and beg cawk for more screenshots please


* - mehtevas - Feb 4, 2017

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5542684 nice copy and paste


* - SIM-2762393 - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 07:22 AM)mehtevas Wrote:  https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5542684 nice copy and paste
Not because a part of it means it's all copy pasted


* - mehtevas - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 07:26 AM)MindBreaker Wrote:  Not because a part of it means it's all copy pasted

yes


* - cawkre - Feb 4, 2017

(Feb 4, 2017 06:46 AM)MindBreaker Wrote:  It's a modified version of a obfuscator and it's not Ben's obfuscator + I got permission from the owner.
And based on what you saying that it is the former "free" NETGuard version? your damn obfuscators got a lot of tutorials on how to deobfuscate some of the options which are :

Native shield and anti-tamper, Strings, ctflow and reference proxy and calli

this is completely false

there is no tutorial for anti tamper nor ctflow for starters

netguard is now that modified that its basically its own protector

the tutorials for strings and calli (the ones written by me) they dont work anymore both of them dont xeno did a good job updating them also both tutorials never taught anyone how to code a full cleaner for it only the concept on how they work.

the native layer written by alcatraz also doesnt work no more so your point is invalid the only tutorial i would say thats sort of close to still working is native layer but you still need to do some new tricks also removing the anti tamper isnt as easy as you think

so no netguard doenst have public ways of unpacking

i am now going to check this file and compare to ben mhenni's protector which i also have so i will update this post when i get a running file


* - SIM-2762393 - Feb 4, 2017

Closed for sales trashing