![]() |
|
Chk4Run | The #1 and ONLY Runtime AV Scanner on the market! | Test Your Crypter! | - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105) +--- Forum: Premium (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=451) +---- Forum: Cryptography and Encryption Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=299) +---- Thread: Chk4Run | The #1 and ONLY Runtime AV Scanner on the market! | Test Your Crypter! | (/showthread.php?tid=5551030) |
Chk4Run | The #1 and ONLY Runtime AV Scanner on the market! | Test Your Crypter! | - Codefuser - Feb 14, 2017 There currently is an error in the engine! Do not purchase until fixed. Chk4Run
The only runtime scanner on the market Ever wondered whether your crypted executable bypasses defense solutions or not? Do you want to install virtual machines to test your files against antivirus products but don't have the resource and time to do so? This service is just for you! - Our site is coded from scratch. No backdoors or information leakage is possible. - Absolutely no distribution. All of the VMs used are not connected to the internet, therefore the file is never distributed to the AVs. We also delete your file immediately after the scan. - SSL/HTTPS for your security. - Most common antivirus solutions are present. - Autobuy with BTC. Completely anonymous. No information is recorded. We check the payment status every 5 minutes with a cron job. - 2 options: Pay per scan and a time based token. Antivirus lists: - MSE - DrWeb - Avira - AVG - Bitdefender - 360 Total Security - ESET - GData - Kaspersky Notes: - Scans WILL take time. - Payments are handled manually too. TOS: - Do not attempt to hack the site. - Don't harass the support. - No refunds. - No sharing the token. Screenshots: Spoiler (Click to View) Some scans: https://www.chk4run.com/index.php?do=result&id=10 (ExterBYte)) * - Koopa. - Feb 14, 2017 Seems like a nice service. How long would a file take to scan? It would be nice to see crypters with a scan from this to check their "Runtime FUD" title and make sure false adverts are differentiated from truthful adverts. * - Slavoj Žižek - Feb 14, 2017 ohhhhhhhh shiet, this is good ty codefurry * - Codefuser - Feb 14, 2017 (Feb 14, 2017 05:29 AM)Koopa. Wrote: Seems like a nice service. How long would a file take to scan? Approximately 20 minutes, it takes around 2 minutes/AV and we got 9 ATM More AVs coming. * - Purple Kief - Feb 14, 2017 HF needed something like this. Best of luck with your sales. * - shane - Feb 14, 2017 Vouch for Codefuser, GLWS. * - VirtualMon3y - Feb 14, 2017 Nice scanner Op. Good luck with it. * - Malicious Intent - Feb 14, 2017 Great job man .. very useful service .. I can already see some shit crypter sellers afraid of this baby. * - The Unknown Coder - Feb 14, 2017 $5 dollars will include unlimited runtime scanning for a day with multiple files? Amazing alternative to dyncheck, tho avs should be selectable imo. * - Meedman - Feb 14, 2017 That was realy nice project I have buy a similar project and have been scammed --' * - xHeaven - Feb 14, 2017 Huge vouch for my buddy Codefuser <3 My Orcus stub bitches. https://www.chk4run.com/index.php?do=result&id=9 * - ♦ [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅1000)̲̅$̲̅] ♦ - Feb 14, 2017 Hell yes. Thank you brother * - Codefuser - Feb 14, 2017 (Feb 14, 2017 11:46 AM)The Unknown Coder Wrote: $5 dollars will include unlimited runtime scanning for a day with multiple files? Yes, it is a time based system. Pay per scan is also possible. And AVs are not selectable, else crypter coders will remove some AVs and act like their shit is clean runtime. * - onlinecrypt - Feb 14, 2017 hello try enable distribution and internet and compare scan without distribution, like useless results with distribution, real world condition, accurate results nothing more but like dyncheck adjust as you wish bye * - Codefuser - Feb 14, 2017 (Feb 14, 2017 07:43 PM)onlinecrypt Wrote: hello We will consider adding that as an option and displaying whether internet is enabled on scan result page. Thank you for your input. And yes, I know that without internet connection, the runtime would be less aggressive due to not being able to connect to the AV's cloud server. Edit: Got a bug atm, fixing it. |