+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Keyloggers (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=113)
+---- Thread: Information on keyloggers being FUD (/showthread.php?tid=5551853)
Information on keyloggers being FUD - Kicking - Feb 14, 2017
I just want everyone to know, that keyloggers are not made to be FUD, a keylogger is NOT a crypter by any means. So before you sales trash any keylogger sellers on here for their keylogger not being 100% FUD, make sure you understand this. They made crypters for a reason.
Also just like RATs, these are going to be detected unless they're refuded every time there's a detection because this IS malware.
Any before anyone says "Ohh but your thread and sig say your keylogger is 100% FUD," go read the bottom of my sales thread
* - Ancestral - Feb 15, 2017
Hi yes.
I agree, keyloggers although may be fud at the beginning, must always be used along side a crypter for best results.
Thanks.
* - HexaCrypt - Feb 15, 2017
You are 1000% correct over here.
* - Praet0rian - Feb 15, 2017
(Feb 14, 2017 11:51 PM)KickingRG Wrote: I just want everyone to know, that keyloggers are not made to be FUD, a keylogger is NOT a crypter by any means. So before you sales trash any keylogger sellers on here for their keylogger not being 100% FUD, make sure you understand this. They made crypters for a reason.
Also just like RATs, these are going to be detected unless they're refuded every time there's a detection because this IS malware.
Any before anyone says "Ohh but your thread and sig say your keylogger is 100% FUD," go read the bottom of my sales thread
Yep, I wholeheartdly agree with you, You cannot expect it to remain FUD forever, especially when it's on a public website known for tools like yours coming out.
* - Kicking - Feb 15, 2017
(Feb 15, 2017 01:43 AM)Praet0rian Wrote: Yep, I wholeheartdly agree with you, You cannot expect it to remain FUD forever, especially when it's on a public website known for tools like yours coming out.
And that is what people do not understand, they expect it to be some amazing program that AV's can't detect, and when they don't get clients they come complaining saying "WHY IS THIS NOT FUD??" or something along those lines.
* - LearningToCode - Feb 15, 2017
Which crypter will work with Venom , any suggestions?
* - Kicking - Feb 15, 2017
(Feb 15, 2017 10:56 AM)LearningToCode Wrote: Which crypter will work with Venom , any suggestions?
I was told Rata and Static work well with Venom. This is just what I was told by a customer, but not 100% sure!
* - Kicking - Feb 15, 2017
(Feb 15, 2017 02:33 PM)Praet0rian Wrote: I wsih you the best of luck for your product.
I appreciate that, but that's not what this thread is for.