![]() |
|
[C#] Assembly.Load(byte[]).EntryPoint.Invoke(null, null); Question - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [C#] Assembly.Load(byte[]).EntryPoint.Invoke(null, null); Question (/showthread.php?tid=5623525) |
Assembly.Load(byte[]).EntryPoint.Invoke(null, null); Question - DelusionalGhost - May 15, 2017 Okay, so im working on a packer called .NET Squeezer and im struggling.. ive made an Anti-Dump, yet it still dumps the files from Assembly.Load(byte[]).EntryPoint.Invoke(null, null); So i got thinking and thgouht, hmm.. mabie i can make a PE for .NET, so i worked on that, and it STILL Dumped, so i cringed and got pissed. Anyone know any kind of method or a way i can prevent Dumping while creating an instance with reflection? * - cawkre - May 15, 2017 Look at confuserex it has an anti dump Read the source and see how it works * - HFDone - May 15, 2017 google c# anti dump and you should find the answer * - w4zt3d - May 15, 2017 Code //just in case ur to lazy to google - idk where i got this from its old.Code uint dwOld = 0;* - dzvtkfuqqe - May 16, 2017 (May 15, 2017 07:20 AM)DelusionalGhost Wrote: Okay, so im working on a packer called .NET Squeezer and im struggling.. ive made an Anti-Dump, yet it still dumps the files from Assembly.Load(byte[]).EntryPoint.Invoke(null, null); So i got thinking and thgouht, hmm.. mabie i can make a PE for .NET, so i worked on that, and it STILL Dumped, so i cringed and got pissed. Anyone know any kind of method or a way i can prevent Dumping while creating an instance with reflection? I'm basically parroting what others on their thread have said but looking at ConfuserEX is a worthwhile option. It's open-source and gives valid examples of how multiple confusion techniques are done.. IE protection against dumping. Head over to yck1509's git. I would link you but I can't post links. And I'd rather not incur a report for attempting to bypass this rule. * - DelusionalGhost - May 16, 2017 (May 16, 2017 06:22 AM)dzvtkfuqqe Wrote: I'm basically parroting what others on their thread have said but looking at ConfuserEX is a worthwhile option. It's open-source and gives valid examples of how multiple confusion techniques are done.. IE protection against dumping. Head over to yck1509's git. I would link you but I can't post links. And I'd rather not incur a report for attempting to bypass this rule. Thanks man, i appreciate your help! |