![]() |
|
NjRAT over Quasar or Quasar over NjRAT? - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Remote Administration Tools (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=114) +---- Thread: NjRAT over Quasar or Quasar over NjRAT? (/showthread.php?tid=5668904) |
NjRAT over Quasar or Quasar over NjRAT? - Quacker Oats - Jul 13, 2017 Which one do you prefer when it comes into stability and performance and why? NjRAT or Quasar? * - Windows - Jul 13, 2017 Probably Quasar because its stabler to use than NjRAT since that has been out forever and may not be that fast or a bit unstable. * - Quacker Oats - Jul 13, 2017 Bump.............................. [warn] * - #Skyline - Jul 13, 2017 Of course Quasar, it's open sourced. * - Quacker Oats - Jul 13, 2017 (Jul 13, 2017 10:32 PM)#Skyline Wrote: Of course Quasar, it's open sourced. Is it compatible with cyber-seal? * - Erylaos - Jul 14, 2017 (Jul 13, 2017 10:38 PM)Quacker Oats Wrote: Is it compatible with cyber-seal? Yess it is. You need to search a crypter who support .net files * - Melkior - Aug 21, 2017 (Jul 14, 2017 01:35 AM)Erylaos Wrote: Yess it is. You need to search a crypter who support .net files No it's not actually. * - yotoprules - Aug 21, 2017 njRAT because Quasar requires .net 4 while njRAT only needs .net 2, which is a lot more compatible with more crypters. |