![]() |
|
Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126) +---- Thread: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time (/showthread.php?tid=5847664) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - Vloner - Jun 11, 2018 I'll pay up to 100 USD for a crypter that can do this. Thanks RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - int - Jun 12, 2018 This question is asked literally every week. Barely any crypters are runtime fud. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - inyourmemory - Jun 13, 2018 (Jun 12, 2018 05:32 PM)Jukeboxhook Wrote: This question is asked literally every week. Barely any crypters are runtime fud. False, i know lot of crypters that are runtime FUD however people here have 5$ budget and dont know where to look RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - int - Jun 13, 2018 (Jun 13, 2018 05:30 PM)Win64Worm Wrote: False, i know lot of crypters that are runtime FUD I already know OP is asking on hf. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - Path - Jun 13, 2018 I can use a personal method to make it fud, can get it to 0/21, worst case 1 detection but will be a once use stub and so completely fud unless distributed RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - ThatCastle - Jun 14, 2018 .net or native? .Net is easier than native but isnt rly a problem to get fud. write me on skype: GeoZeto RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - SIM-1589588 - Jun 14, 2018 You can get a crypt for 20-30$ but not a good crypter in that price. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - inyourmemory - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 13, 2018 05:47 PM)Jukeboxhook Wrote: I already know OP is asking on hf. There are still couple fud crypts on hf RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - int - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 01:49 AM)Win64Worm Wrote: There are still couple fud crypts on hf I have literally seen 1 RT/ST FUD crypter on hf, which ended up being slotted and private later. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - inyourmemory - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 06:34 AM)Jukeboxhook Wrote: I have literally seen 1 RT/ST FUD crypter on hf, which ended up being slotted and private later. NTCrypt, PolyPE, titancrypt for start RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - int - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 06:51 AM)Win64Worm Wrote: NTCrypt, PolyPE, titancrypt for start none of these are stickied in the cryptography section. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - Exodus - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 06:55 AM)Jukeboxhook Wrote: none of these are stickied in the cryptography section. Here you go: NTCrypt: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5807160 PolyPE: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5846102 Titancrypt: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5707838&highlight=TitanCrypt RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - int - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 06:58 AM)ManlyPotato Wrote: Here you go: I already googled them. RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - inyourmemory - Jun 14, 2018 (Jun 14, 2018 06:55 AM)Jukeboxhook Wrote: none of these are stickied in the cryptography section. why would they need to be stickied? implying that sticky somehow proves crypters bypass? RE: Looking for a crypter that can bypass run time and scan time - BananaPancake - Jun 14, 2018 Any FUD .net (4.0) supported crypters you recommend? |