+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Remote Administration Tools (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Thread: [RAT's] Stable != Stable (/showthread.php?tid=5928919)
[RAT's] Stable != Stable - ThatCastle - Jan 12, 2019
Hey guys,
I'd like to ask if you guys maby have an idea which Rat's
are stable? I mean, when is a server stable, what are the criterions
for calling a Rat stable?
I am on writing my own and while I started to get more
info's from the clients, It become unstable at 500 connections.
Is it still stable or would u guys say, that this is unstable.
best regards, TheCastle!
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - I.M.P - Jan 12, 2019
I think # and webmonitor would be more stable than most
especially with webmonitor being more web based it can probably handle more requests
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - NYANxCAT - Jan 12, 2019
You can test AsyncRAT it's on Github and stable. You should try it.
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - #Skyline - Jan 12, 2019
Just remember there is more to a stable RAT then the program itself, like your network connection speed and CPU usage.
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - ThatCastle - Jan 14, 2019
(Jan 12, 2019 04:19 PM)Atroxcity Wrote: I think # and webmonitor would be more stable than most
especially with webmonitor being more web based it can probably handle more requests
(Jan 12, 2019 11:58 PM)#Skyline Wrote: Just remember there is more to a stable RAT then the program itself, like your network connection speed and CPU usage.
Thanks for the quick answer, I know what u mean, HTTP-Rats could handle more than 10.000 even 100.000 clients but i wanna code it on TCP connection.
(Jan 12, 2019 09:53 PM)˗ˏˋ NYAN CAT ˎˊ˗ Wrote: You can test AsyncRAT it's on Github and stable. You should try it.Is it with the non-blocking thing? Sounds very interesting, I will take a look, THX!
(Jan 12, 2019 11:58 PM)#Skyline Wrote: Just remember there is more to a stable RAT then the program itself, like your network connection speed and CPU usage.
CPU usage is not a problem as also Memory usage is, i guess that the network thing is a problem 😑
I thought about coding a HTTP-Rat but in my opinion there are too many disatvantages...
(Jan 12, 2019 09:53 PM)˗ˏˋ NYAN CAT ˎˊ˗ Wrote: You can test AsyncRAT it's on Github and stable. You should try it.
Dude, your project is freakn awsome!
But I see that this rat has the same problem if i wanna connect with round about 500- 1000 clients :(
Guess I have something to edit on the networks but its realy nice
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - NYANxCAT - Jan 14, 2019
Thanks for your feedback. Maybe try to run it outside VMware. Also maybe try to disable ping timer.
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - ThatCastle - Jan 15, 2019
(Jan 14, 2019 06:57 PM)˗ˏˋ NYAN CAT ˎˊ˗ Wrote: Thanks for your feedback. Maybe try to run it outside VMware. Also maybe try to disable ping timer.
I dont use VM Ware, its exploitable and not safe anymore...
But I still think that your project is a huge factor for the future rats, I guess, that many of them will be based on yours
great work 🤝
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - Nick (Name) - Jan 15, 2019
(Jan 15, 2019 09:16 AM)ThatCastle Wrote: I dont use VM Ware, its exploitable and not safe anymore...
But I still think that your project is a huge factor for the future rats, I guess, that many of them will be based on yours
great work 🤝
There’s plenty of remote software that use asynchronous calls, they’re just not stated as a feature or in the name because it’s a bit of a standard since 2012. If you don’t think VMware is safe then you should understand that AsyncRAT doesn’t authenticate any tcp clients connecting.
RE: [RAT's] Stable != Stable - Threatening - Jan 15, 2019
Quasar rat is a good open source rat