+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126)
+---- Thread: Dyncheck vs Run4Me (/showthread.php?tid=6005497)
Dyncheck vs Run4Me - AnonFawkes - Sep 6, 2019
Which service provides more accurate results?
DynCheck or Run4me?
ty
RE: Dyncheck vs Run4Me - One - Sep 6, 2019
(Sep 6, 2019 12:06 AM)AnonFawkes Wrote: Which service provides more accurate results?
DynCheck or Run4me?
ty
I recommend Cyberscan or Antiscan.me
RE: Dyncheck vs Run4Me - AnonFawkes - Sep 6, 2019
(Sep 6, 2019 12:30 AM)Tygaking Wrote: I recommend Cyberscan or Antiscan.me
DynCheck and Run4Me are Runtime scanners.
Cyberscan and antiscan.me are Scantime scanners.
Im interested in the runtime results.
RE: Dyncheck vs Run4Me - One - Sep 6, 2019
(Sep 6, 2019 12:35 AM)AnonFawkes Wrote: DynCheck and Run4Me are Runtime scanners.
Cyberscan and antiscan.me are Scantime scanners.
Im interested in the runtime results.
Well you can go with Dyncheck
But scanners dont give best results,I have 5 virtual machines with 5 antivirus which i use in testing for runtime detections and its the best
RE: Dyncheck vs Run4Me - Nauhsea - Sep 6, 2019
Doing runtime checks manually would be the go to honestly, there's so much controversy over whether non distributing scanners provide real results. But hypothetically if I had to choose between the two it would be DynCheck without a doubt!
RE: Dyncheck vs Run4Me - Royal ! - Sep 6, 2019
Get a VM and test yourself, if you are that much "curious".