![]() |
|
[Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hack Forums Official Information (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Site News (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Suggestions and Ideas (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=134) +---- Thread: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof (/showthread.php?tid=6055863) |
[Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - RBH - Mar 10, 2020 There are always a couple Bustabit script sellers in the seller section trying to convince people that they found the magic secret for infinite profit. Since Bustabit, like every other casino, has a house edge it is impossible to win in the long run. Unfortunately, it can take quite some time before a script loses so when people link to a bustabit profile it might seem as if they will always be winning based on past performance. That is why I suggest that every bustabit seller needs to simulate their script with a simulator like: https://mtihc.github.io/bustabit-script-simulator/ (open source) The simulator should be configured on the minimum bankroll the seller advises and with the minimum starting bet they advise. It should also be put on atleast 20k rounds on multiple hashes. 20k rounds is approximately equal to 3.5 days of non stop play. The hashes can't be cherrypicked, so a valid selection can be 10 consecutive letters of the alphabet as starting hashes. Example: Lets say I want to sell a revolutionary martingale evolved script which has an advised bankroll of 10k bits (~80$) and an advised bet of 1 bit (0.000022$) . In that case I can show the following "proof": https://imgur.com/a/HtjEJQ1 3 losses out of 5. At the moment buyers often say there is risk involved but they give no indication how much risk. They also hide this disclaimer somewhere small. If this is enforced it can give buyers an idea on what they can expect and they can see that it is often not guaranteed profit. If enforcing this in threads is not possible, a rule can be made that if it is requested by a reply in the sellers thread the seller can't refuse. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - 123 - Mar 10, 2020 Very nice suggestion. I'll always give a reference to this thread whenever I see a seller thread for Bustabit Script. The tool is indeed great. Thanks for suggesting. Quick loved !! RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - Eagle 95 - Mar 10, 2020 While your suggestion is good, there's no reason for us to enforce it. Anyone that buys gambling script(s) and thinks (s)he has an edge over house is a moron. I've seen so many people scammed for buying such methods and scripts. Do I feel sorry for them? Yeah I do. Could that be prevented? Yeah, don't buy gambling scripts and/or methods!!! Btw, rule suggestions aren't allowed. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - skins2come - Mar 10, 2020 Awesome tool, thanks for sharing! I 100% agree with Eagle, anybody who is thinking about buying such a script is a complete naive moron in my opinion.. The only way you can profit from those sites is investing Into their bankroll. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - RBH - Mar 10, 2020 (Mar 10, 2020 05:44 AM)Eagle 95 Wrote: While your suggestion is good, there's no reason for us to enforce it. Anyone that buys gambling script(s) and thinks (s)he has an edge over house is a moron. I've seen so many people scammed for buying such methods and scripts. Do I feel sorry for them? Yeah I do. Could that be prevented? Yeah, don't buy gambling scripts and/or methods!!! Yea I was afraid that would be the answer. It sucks that people still fall for those scams and often the sellers themselves even believe it works. Didn't know rule suggestions weren't allowed, my apologies. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - Charger - Mar 10, 2020 HF does not get involved in deals or proving items are legit. Also, gambling, fundamentally, always has a house edge meaning you’ll always lose in the long run. No different than the blacksshadow “iTs nOt RaNdoM iF tHeRe iS a PatTErn” meme RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - RBH - Mar 10, 2020 (Mar 10, 2020 06:13 AM)Charger Wrote: HF does not get involved in deals or proving items are legit. Also, gambling, fundamentally, always has a house edge meaning you’ll always lose in the long run. Yea I was trying to remember that username. I remember him posting threads and threads again selling his scripts till at some point he was finally banned. (Mar 10, 2020 06:13 AM)Charger Wrote: Also, gambling, fundamentally, always has a house edge meaning you’ll always lose in the long run.Yes, You and I know that but unfortunately there are still enough members here who get seduced by nice looking sales threads with "GUARANTEED Profit" in the title. (Mar 10, 2020 06:13 AM)Charger Wrote: HF does not get involved in deals or proving items are legit. I guess that would be unmanageable, just sucks to see those script sellers still find victims. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - Luca - Mar 10, 2020 Very good idea. Looking forward to thus actually being enforced. RE: [Suggestion] Require Bustabit script sellers to show simulation proof - Omniscient - Mar 11, 2020 Why bother requiring sellers to show proof? It's the buyers responsibility for due diligence before purchase. That goes for all products and services sold on HF. |