Oldschool Protector | Scantime FUD & Runtime UD | C/ASM | RunPE+LoadPE

Oldschool Protector | Scantime FUD & Runtime UD | C/ASM | RunPE+LoadPE | .NET&Native - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Auxiliary (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=453)
+---- Forum: Member Sales Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=176)
+---- Thread: Oldschool Protector | Scantime FUD & Runtime UD | C/ASM | RunPE+LoadPE | .NET&Native (/showthread.php?tid=6071816)

Pages: Pages 1 2

Oldschool Protector | Scantime FUD & Runtime UD | C/ASM | RunPE+LoadPE | .NET&Native - stringsnstuff - Apr 26, 2020

Oldschool Protector | Crypter | C/ASM | No dependencies | Bypass Windows Defender | RunPE + LoadPE

$35 per month
$80/3 months

Features:
C/ASM
RunPE stub
LoadPE stub
.NET 4.0 RunPE stub
AES encryption
50-100KB stubs
Anti-dumping
Anti-disassembler
No dependencies
Anti-debugger scripts
Checks for hook scripts
Bypass Windows Defender
Dynamically calls functions/API's
Builder requires C++ 2015 redistributable for cURL.
100% Scantime FUD and 5/23 runtime as of 5/3/2020
Anti-emulator(VPS, VMware, Virtualbox, Sandboxie, AV emulators, and more)

Stub update (RunPE) 0/26 https://antiscan.me/scan/new/result?id=L7IeONhraiBb
Stub update (LoadPE) 0/26 https://antiscan.me/scan/new/result?id=3B4vsMGDJJ5k
Here is runtime check (5/23 - crypted Dark Comet): https://dyncheck.com/scan/id/ffd96f037b59a3aa0904123ca539b671

Post on this thread and fill out a contract. Will only accept cryptocurrency.
Have any questions? Contact me by private message

Telegram @stringsnstuff
Jabber stringsnstuff at xmpp.jp

[contract=tid]Start Contract[/contract]

Vouch copies
Spoiler (Click to View)

Reviews from purchase
Spoiler (Click to View)

YouTube video in action

Terms of Service
Refund won't be issued.
Oldschool Protector will be used for educational purposes only.
DO NOT scan crypted file on sites that distribute such as Virus Total.
Don't post any of your problems on the thread, if you have a problem then come ask the developer.
ONLY scan on sites that DO NOT distribute such as Antiscan, Kleenscan, Cyberscan, AVBox, and Dyncheck.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Lextian - Apr 26, 2020

Posting to come back when am ready to test this with DarkVision rat.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - stringsnstuff - May 1, 2020

Here is new updated stub crypted with Gaudox: https://www.kleenscan.com/scan_result/1ec0b93fb3ff830324dd4c1fa0c7e943879eb8cec452449dd3219959fd7fd3c3

https://antiscan.me/scan/new/result?id=TkWS8iLveGRy

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Scrubspoof - May 1, 2020

Could I get a vouch copy? I'll review your product fully and do a write up.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - stringsnstuff - May 3, 2020

(May 1, 2020 05:43 PM)Scrubspoof Wrote: Could I get a vouch copy? I'll review your product fully and do a write up.

I don't mind giving you a vouch copy, we should use the market system for vouch copy. Fill out the contract form and mark "Vouch Copy".

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - TheAnon.hf - May 3, 2020

are you offering vouch copies?

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Predator2 - May 3, 2020

do you offer , private stub?

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - stringsnstuff - May 3, 2020

Here is newest FUD scantime check. Kleenscan https://kleenscan.com/scan_result/d87aa064c3dd3ef5d2ec690bfda0f8a98be7808a03893afe176308a9f845c65b
Here is runtime check on dyncheck. https://dyncheck.com/scan/id/34f6c80497814716d059143f03440d43
And avbox https://avbox.info/page/scan-result?task_id=7x8wnDeLjgv0

(May 3, 2020 12:06 PM)Predator2 Wrote: do you offer , private stub?

Yes offering private stub, private messaging you now.

(May 3, 2020 11:50 AM)TheAnon.hf Wrote: are you offering vouch copies?

Yes I am offering a vouch copy fill out the form, thanks.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Subliminal_ - May 3, 2020

Please delete this message, it is no longer required.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Raz3rTuto - May 3, 2020

I just send you a contract for vouch copy please answer me :)

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - Scrubspoof - May 3, 2020

I have removed my review. Disregard this post.

RE: Oldschool Protector | Crypter | RunPE + LoadPE | No dependencies | C/ASM - stringsnstuff - May 4, 2020

Thanks for your review. You were saying your file wouldn't run in VM. I said that it has anti emulator scripts and this is why it won't run in VM. I'm pretty sure my crypter is compatible with your software it's just you were trying to test in VM. And you said 3/30 on Kleenscan. You can look and see that SecureAPEX engine is always saying "Malicious" so it's a false positive, and VBA32 and NANO are only detected on Kleenscan.

New .NET 4.0 stub FUD 0/30 crypted with Quasar: https://kleenscan.com/scan_result/be7e294f19aea164dbb1eff89d872143b1fb89466df635ca4221a6db67ad9783

[Image: d5e960b6892141c47155158ac798a61b.png]

My review about the Oldschool Protector

This crypter is surely good and has a nice code behind it, they detection rate is low compared to most of the products on the market so yeah. Here some results Without and With Oldschool Protector,

Here's Without Oldschool Protector:

[Image: 0jF6ig9.png]

Here's With Oldschool Protector:

[Image: KtyAEuq.png]

Overall a nice crypter you want to buy, price it's right by my opinion, keeping in mind this is a very HQ Crypter I would recommend, it might be a bit pricy but with some reworks I think I would definitely grab a copy!

My suggestions: Add a more detailed GUI, it will benefit! Trust Me!

(May 4, 2020 01:35 PM)TheAnon.hf Wrote: My suggestions: Add a more detailed GUI, it will benefit! Trust Me!

I think the whole thing is that it's supposed to represent an old UI.