(Dec 12, 2020 09:20 AM)Mark Skith Wrote:  Yeah I found that to be a problem, I'm adding it as a addon that you can purchase from kleenscan separately, or possibly I could make a deal with kleenscan where I get bulk accounts so that I can give every client their own personal key as part of purchasing my crypter.

(Dec 13, 2020 01:47 AM)neon_light Wrote:  I mean, i doubt that kleenscan would go for this. The secure way of providing scans in your crypter is to do those scans server side on your own server.

This way you can easily limit scans per customer (based on their license id) to something like 100 scans per week, without giving away your kleenscan API key.

(Dec 11, 2020 08:07 PM)Mark Skith Wrote:  I recently bought kleenscan and wanted to add it to my c# applications, here is the code I used.

Code

using(var httpClient = new HttpClient()) {
  using(var request = new HttpRequestMessage(new HttpMethod("POST"), "https://kleenscan.com/api/v1/file/scan")) {
    var multipartContent = new MultipartFormDataContent {
      {
        new ByteArrayContent(File.ReadAllBytes("your_file_path_here")),
        "path",
        Path.GetFileName("your_file_path_here")
      },
      {
        new StringContent("avast,avg"),
        "avList"
      }
    };
    request.Content = multipartContent;
    request.Headers.Add("X-Auth-Token", "Your Authentication Token Here");
    var response = await httpClient.SendAsync(request);
    string resp = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result).ToString();
  }
}

Successful response, containing the scan_token looks like this:

Code

"success" => true
"error_message" => "";
"data" => [
"scan_token" => "bc0890be7133616e68f5d81207cca045"
]

This is just for uploading files, which a lot of people seem to be having a hard time with. Getting avlist and results is easy enough.

(Dec 21, 2020 07:42 AM)riu41776 Wrote:  You're just uploading a PE to a remote cloud which runs a scan on their side using AVG and Avast (according to your params).

(Dec 21, 2020 07:42 AM)riu41776 Wrote:  Why not just reference people here to their api instead of writing a wrapper on top of it?