![]() |
|
[UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: General Topics (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: World (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=445) +---- Forum: News and Happenings (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89) +---- Thread: [UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin (/showthread.php?tid=6129610) |
[UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - Xphile - Dec 26, 2020 21 people have been arrested across the UK as part of an operation targeting customers of WeLeakInfo (taken down in January 2020) a service that advertised stolen credentials.
RE: [UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - flavoral - Dec 26, 2020 oh damn National Crime Agency UK still popin' RE: [UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - Angel - Dec 26, 2020 Well done my G National Crime Agency UK well done... RE: [UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - Tjm - Dec 27, 2020 Good work, CC/identity fraud is the shittest thing to do to someone. What do they end up doing with seized crypto assets anyways? RE: [UK] 21 WeLeakInfo Customers Arrested, over 41,000 pounds seized in Bitcoin - Xphile - Dec 28, 2020 (Dec 27, 2020 05:33 PM)Tjm Wrote: Good work, CC/identity fraud is the shittest thing to do to someone. What do they end up doing with seized crypto assets anyways? After skimming over the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, it seems that if the court decides that the defendant has a "criminal lifestyle" and has benefited from their "criminal conduct", they can determine a recoverable amount of money and make a confiscation order, where the defendant must pay the court. So in usual instances, the seized assets are given a value and then the defendant has to pay that amount or they'll get a default criminal sentence + interest on the order (on top of their conviction for Computer Misuse or Fraud in this case) - unsure how this applies to crypto however, UK legislation doesn't seem to accommodate for that just yet? But I would assume that it's handled the same way and paid to the court and subsequently paid to the victims (where possible) or put into government funding, either way, I doubt the defendants are ever going to see it again. lol UK Legislation page - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/29/contents Fact sheet for POCA 2002 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/317904/Fact_Sheet_-_Overview_of_POCA__2_.pdf |