![]() |
|
what would be the best public rat to modify? - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Grayhat • Purple Team • Hybrid Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=449) +---- Forum: Beginner Hacking (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +----- Forum: Hacking Tutorials (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=47) +----- Thread: what would be the best public rat to modify? (/showthread.php?tid=6193887) |
what would be the best public rat to modify? - guriguri - Feb 16, 2022 i have this found a vulnerability in a common program i'd want to take advatage of as a proof of concept i'm able to send a the metasploit rat and things like that, but obviously that woudn't work in any situation unless windows defender is completely down. i'd like to demonstrate that even today exploits in binaries which allow for remote code execution can be super dangerous. doing something like sending a file or executing some hand written asm is cool but it's obvious that RCE can own a machine. i wouldn't want to do it from scratch though. for example the MSF multistage framework is really nice at helping you make your shellcode as small as be able to send the real file only once a connection has been made. so i'd like to know which publicly available rat would be relatively simple in its structure that i could work on and change it and make it obfuscated enough so that it won't flag. keep in mind that i don't need the initial file a standalone executable initially, i'm already in execution so i can in fact execute things before deploying the actual malware. RE: what would be the best public rat to modify? - MeW11 - Feb 17, 2022 (Feb 16, 2022 09:58 AM)guriguri Wrote: i have this found a vulnerability in a common program i'd want to take advatage of as a proof of concept quasar isn't bad, asyncrat, dcrat if you can translate Chinese. |