![]() |
|
Development Thread | RustLoader | Advanced and Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Botnets and Botting (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=92) +---- Thread: Development Thread | RustLoader | Advanced and Modern HTTP Loader | Rust (/showthread.php?tid=6210520) |
Development Thread | RustLoader | Advanced and Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 22, 2022 This is a thread to show the progress of the loader i soon plan to sell here on HF, if you have any suggestions or requests of what i should add please send them here The current functionality it has right now are: A:Loader 1.Drop in WD exclusions folder and run 2.Drop in non WD exclusions folder and run B:Update C:Startup and persistance D:UAC exploit 1.Adds install paths to WD exclusion & WD exclusions drop folder 2.Restarts loader with admin(either on startup or after exploit is ran) E:Very basic botkiller(wont release till deemed ready aka when its the best killer ik of) F:Communications over HTTP RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - Super - Jun 22, 2022 Seems really cool, but I have a couple questions about it. What does WD exclusions folder mean? Also, does the UAC bypass work on the latest version of Windows 11, or is it targeting outdated systems? RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 22, 2022 (Jun 22, 2022 07:22 PM)Super Wrote: Seems really cool, but I have a couple questions about it. WD exclusions folder is a windows defender exclusions folder where windows defender and a alright handful of other AVs will not scan the selected locations, and my UAC exploit i use works on the newest version of w10 and w11 with nearly every AV, i can send some runtime scans using my uac exploit Scans using the exploit: https://checkzilla.io/scan/2319e9a3-69cc-4f28-85aa-c8b692e8e7ef https://checkzilla.io/scan/8b34995d-11f2-41bd-831d-6bf1af453f26 (Some major changes have happened between those scans with my dropper) Also when this is ready for sale ill probably move over to one of my better exploits i have saved away to ensure the best results RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - Super - Jun 22, 2022 (Jun 22, 2022 07:39 PM)NotKover Wrote: WD exclusions folder is a windows defender exclusions folder where windows defender and a alright handful of other AVs will not scan the selected locations, and my UAC exploit i use works on the newest version of w10 and w11 with nearly every AV, i can send some runtime scans using my uac exploit That's amazing you have a working UAC exploit, most of the ones I know about have gotten patched by now. Seems like it will be a good product, GLWS. RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 22, 2022 (Jun 22, 2022 08:31 PM)Super Wrote: That's amazing you have a working UAC exploit, most of the ones I know about have gotten patched by now. Thank you very much, if you have any suggestions please let me know because i dont really know what i should and shouldnt add RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - TheGate - Jun 23, 2022 Are you going to give any vouchies for this? RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 23, 2022 (Jun 23, 2022 12:36 AM)TheGate Wrote: Are you going to give any vouchies for this? once i think its ready maybe, mainly depends on how well it turns out RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - __Digital__ - Jun 23, 2022 Good luck with your project, i understand why people are using rust. Because it remains fud longer due to avs not caught with it yet. It just reminds me of the good old autoit binary. but with rust they are 10mb easy. As i said good luck with your project hope it is very successful. RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 23, 2022 (Jun 23, 2022 07:55 AM)__Digital__ Wrote: Good luck with your project, i understand why people are using rust. Because it remains fud longer due to avs not caught with it yet. It just reminds me of the good old autoit binary. but with rust they are 10mb easy. As i said good luck with your project hope it is very successful. My current binary is only 800KB and has a good handful of functions but once im done the size will probably be like 4MB~ if not more (Jun 23, 2022 09:58 AM)Dyne Wrote: I would love to see how this fares up against HP Wolf Security with dynamic detection. Businesses, banks in the western world have been transitioning workstations to HP infrastructure and subscribing to their dynamic detection modules. Which has proven to be quite good. Once its ready we can do some testing with it and see, i was thinking about how it would handle to enterprise AVs so we can find out later RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - Xzedin - Jun 23, 2022 As long as you have the basics down then start adding the sought after functions. So far so good. Seen your posts graduate to a higher level in this forum. RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - AnonTri - Jun 23, 2022 (Jun 22, 2022 08:36 PM)NotKover Wrote: Thank you very much, if you have any suggestions please let me know because i dont really know what i should and shouldnt add If it does not already it should allow for loading both exe and dll from disk and memory as well as having multiple fallback c2 servers if not giving it a DGA. Though if it does have DGA please allow for fallback c2 to prevent sinkholing. Other than that good persistence and a stable/secure connection will be your biggest selling points for a loader. Anything that makes it more resilient or more likely to last is worth more than any specific features (in terms of logging or proxies or anything not directly related to a loader) RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 23, 2022 (Jun 23, 2022 07:54 PM)AnonTri Wrote: If it does not already it should allow for loading both exe and dll from disk and memory as well as having multiple fallback c2 servers if not giving it a DGA. Though if it does have DGA please allow for fallback c2 to prevent sinkholing. Other than that good persistence and a stable/secure connection will be your biggest selling points for a loader. Anything that makes it more resilient or more likely to last is worth more than any specific features (in terms of logging or proxies or anything not directly related to a loader) These are planned and i have a good handful of "unique" startup and persistence methods i will implement and test to make sure they dont add any detection vectors but it will be awhile before then RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - wyvn - Jun 24, 2022 how long have you been coding in Rust for and how effective would you say it is to learn for malware development? I'm currently looking into learning C++ or C, but Rust seems interesting to me also, I'll be learning from the start so i'd rather get locked in to one, which would you recommend? RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 24, 2022 (Jun 24, 2022 09:02 AM)0xj4y Wrote: how effective would you say it is to learn for malware development?It can be very effective but is hard to learn from since there isnt like any examples on any already (Jun 24, 2022 09:02 AM)0xj4y Wrote: I'm currently looking into learning C++ or C, but Rust seems interesting to me also, I'll be learning from the start so i'd rather get locked in to one, which would you recommend?personally i would go for rust but i would learn c++ or rust RE: Development Thread | RustLoader | Modern HTTP Loader | Rust - NotKover - Jun 26, 2022 Little update, I have been working on a rootkit in rust and have a fully ready and functional userland rootkit and will soon try to work on a kernel level rootkit but will need to do further research into finding a driver to load said kit and wont cause a major detection vector I have also started to work on a AMSI bypass that is not dependent on powershell and will hopefully have it prepared in the next coming days If you have any suggestions or requests or questions, feel free to comment here to message me via PM/convo or telegram @NotKover The current binary size is 1.94MB and i will work to reduce the size, i will soon be implementing more complicated functions to then do extensive testing to ensure there is no detection vectors by any of my methods, if you have any suggestions or request, please let me know |