Hack Forums
Oasis Network (ROSE) - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Money (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=241)
+--- Forum: Crypto Currency (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=380)
+--- Thread: Oasis Network (ROSE) (/showthread.php?tid=6258873)



Oasis Network (ROSE) - HACKED - Dec 18, 2023

https://oasisprotocol.org/
https://www.oasislabs.com/

https://twitter.com/oasisprotocol
https://twitter.com/OasisLabs


"The OasisNetwork provides a privacy layer for Web3. Add Smart Privacy to dApps on any EVM chain — 100% private, 100% public, or anywhere in between."


I've been keeping an eye on this since the previous bull market. It seems that the project steadily gets better.
Great L1 project. Focuses on privacy and scalability. Oasis Labs has significant partnerships including one with BMW group and one with META emphasizing on privacy-preserving use of AI.

Price right now is $0.89 and #133 by MCAP(coingecko). Lowest recent price was $0.035 some months ago.
IMO Oasis Network is going to be a great performer once the alt season starts. It seems we need 6-18 months to see if that is the case.


What are your thoughts? Will update the thread with more information once I have more time.


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - SUI-3183372 - Dec 18, 2023

They don't have native USDC on their network, but they used to have a bridge so you could bridge ETH/BNB based USDC into their ecosystem and get wrapped USDC to trade with. That bridging/wrapping service bailed with everyone's bridged funds last year and tanked the value of USDC to $0.04. Other wrapping services have filled the void and I imagine there's been recovery, but that ecosystem likely won't ever be the same.

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6208677


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - CryptOL - Dec 19, 2023

bought today, see what happens worth having some incase but accumulation seems to have been ages now


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - HACKED - Jan 2, 2024

$ROSE has been doing really well since the start of this thread. Hit the high of $0.15.
I have no intention of selling soon since fundamentals are really great. To be honest I may grab some more if I decide to sell any other crypto.

Additionally, did a small TA and most likely within a week we will seen another spike to $0.17-$018. Not setting any entry or selling points as I don't plan on selling soon.

[Image: 3eif8yn.png]

Let's see how this goes.


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - HACKED - Mar 1, 2024

TA scenario didn't work due to the market crashing shortly mading the above post.
ROSE has been doing well though. Price right now is $0.158 compared to $0.089 when I made the post and it has climbed to #95 according to coingecko.

Some important news include the launch of the first DEX on Oasis Sapphire - Illuminex Swap (https://illuminex.xyz/) and its token IX. Part of the price increase was due to the above news.

Additionally in 5 days the first stable coin on Oasis Sapphire - Vine Money / vUSD (https://twitter.com/Vine_Money) will be launced. Expecting this to increase the price further and pumping it above $.20.

Many more Dapps are popping in next months and bearing in mind the positive sentiment I think that ROSE will continue doing really well. Don't hesitate to buy at the current levels. Bull market is now begining.

Looking to hear your opinions on Oasis Network. You are welcome to share your thoughts.


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - Prettykitty - Mar 1, 2024

Every year they pump this coin lol, daily is holding above 0.1417 so it'd be strong as long as btc and eth are also going up. I think it'll meet 0.18174 target soon.


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - SUI-3183372 - Mar 1, 2024

(Mar 1, 2024 02:08 PM)HACKED Wrote:  TA scenario didn't work due to the market crashing shortly mading the above post.
ROSE has been doing well though. Price right now is $0.158 compared to $0.89 when I made the post and it has climbed to #95 according to coingecko.

You keep saying 0.89 when you mean 0.089


RE: Oasis Network (ROSE) - HACKED - Mar 2, 2024

(Mar 1, 2024 09:06 PM)SIM-3183372 Wrote:  You keep saying 0.89 when you mean 0.089

Thanks for the note. Fixed the post.