![]() |
|
No distribute file scanner? - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126) +---- Thread: No distribute file scanner? (/showthread.php?tid=6281234) |
No distribute file scanner? - oldieparavoc - Oct 3, 2024 Hi, what is a good no distribute file scanner? RE: No distribute file scanner? - Bastille - Oct 3, 2024 Hello, As far as I know this one is often used : - https://www.kleenscan.com/index RE: No distribute file scanner? - SIM-5186353 - Oct 3, 2024 I'm not pretty sure about this one, but take a look. https://www.virscan.org RE: No distribute file scanner? - DramaKing - Oct 3, 2024 (Oct 3, 2024 11:55 AM)Bastille Wrote: Hello, Kleenscan is okay, but it does not execute files in a sandbox, so keep that in mind. RE: No distribute file scanner? - __Digital__ - Oct 3, 2024 I honestly have stuck with the good old avcheck, however always best to do your own testing in a controlled environment. RE: No distribute file scanner? - Sand Ferret - Oct 3, 2024 Your own VM’s running whatever AV’s you want to test. Every runtime scanner I have tested is dog shit and gives inaccurate results. RE: No distribute file scanner? - Bastille - Oct 4, 2024 (Oct 3, 2024 12:44 PM)DramaKing Wrote: Kleenscan is okay, but it does not execute files in a sandbox, so keep that in mind. Thanks for the headsup, but what doest that mean for the result ? I mean, if I run something on my computer I'm glad to have a sandbox, but on an online tool what's the cons not having a sandbox ? |