![]() |
|
Compiler flagging many detections - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126) +---- Thread: Compiler flagging many detections (/showthread.php?tid=6291654) |
Compiler flagging many detections - Hijacker - Feb 7, 2025 Hey guys. I'm here because many compilers use by you -> hackers is detected or just mentioned by ethical hackers used by threat actors. It's basically detecting even using normal one line output with stdout<<hello. Just curious way to go out way with this. I made my own solid obfuscator/crypter degrades from 30 threats by virustotal to only 7, but the compiler is maybe 7. I tried one of the most fanciest keylogger that has been literally been flagged and reversed. I test to flag, that has been reversed by white hats many times. The result was 30->7. That has been fully reversed or something. The compiler, what is maybe flagged, what I think this hinder me from making fud or maybe headers. Btw, I made quite complex project for obfuscating large database and other. I'm just asking you guys to not wasting my time with testing viruses. Sometimes it takes time to find out the way. Here only for answers to not use my time for testing. Unless I would spend my time building my own compiler to make fud, if worth for time. This is potentially waste of time. Anyway many few things, I didn't complete. When I complete the crypter, maybe ready to sell, but it's not supporting every programming languages only one RE: Compiler flagging many detections - GenericSkid - Feb 8, 2025 (Feb 7, 2025 05:13 PM)Hijacker Wrote: by virustotal to only 7 Oh brother.... Has anyone ever explained to you why you don't do this? RE: Compiler flagging many detections - Hackers - Feb 8, 2025 Have you done the following yet? > compiletime encrypt & runtime decrypt - for strings > function pointers & other similar methods > basic anti-bot/vm If you haven't done these 3 yet, try it. RE: Compiler flagging many detections - Hijacker - Feb 8, 2025 1. compile time encrypt & runtime decrypt - for strings and 3 are implemented. Already have applied by sandbox analysis, it's detecting dynamical analysis as x64dbg, ollydbg, antivm resolution, dll from sys32 that and flags whoamI users from virustotal and + anti triage sandbox. Maybe the second didn't. Thanks guys. I'll try to test out. It's windows NT only not linux malware or mac malware Oh brother.... Has anyone ever explained to you why you don't do this? Wdym? RE: Compiler flagging many detections - noxy1001 - Feb 13, 2025 ahh im not even able to compile RE: Compiler flagging many detections - Hijacker - Feb 15, 2025 I just manage to degrade from 8 to 3 finally. I found many holes what antivirus cannot detect. Still 3 is not fud from 23. It should be 0 |