Hack Forums
Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Blackhat Training (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=405)
+---- Thread: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? (/showthread.php?tid=6318660)



Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - JulienLaRoch - Jan 28, 2026

Doing research on phishing pages........ Set up evilginx... tried these all detected.
bought fraudgpt to make pages and having trouble setting up cloaker they all come with these redpages when loaded on chrome...

not sure what to do here......... sorry total noob.........
not a innuendo either about setting up a sim... lol legit doing research...


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Binance - Jan 28, 2026

Cool. There's 100 different versions of this shit now. Even WormGPT isn't the original anymore (some blowhard ackbar is selling his "Version" here on HF), so many people try to piggy back off the names that were big and buzzy in 2023.
I used this before for research, did you buy it from https://t.me/fraudgptsales ?
If so, They use cloak.it which requires .js redirect on your index page under public_html . Gets your domain quickly botted and blacklisted though so it's good for like 24 hours lol.

It's not great GPT software and most of this shit will get you detected and flagged quickly. I wouldnt say it's good for practical use if that's what you're implying.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - DramaKing - Jan 28, 2026

(Jan 28, 2026 10:46 AM)JulienLaRoch Wrote:  Doing research on phishing pages........ Set up evilginx... tried these all detected.
bought fraudgpt to make pages and having trouble setting up cloaker they all come with these redpages when loaded on chrome...

not sure what to do here......... sorry total noob.........
not a innuendo either about setting up a sim... lol legit doing research...

There's no way that you obtained the actual FraudGPT. You obtained a fake clone.

Evilginx should not be automatically detected if the domain was clean.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Binance - Jan 29, 2026

(Jan 28, 2026 12:41 PM)DramaKing Wrote:  There's no way that you obtained the actual FraudGPT. You obtained a fake clone.

Evilginx should not be automatically detected if the domain was clean.

it's all crap, even the original created by bert. best to invest in claude or cursor if you're really that hard up.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - JulienLaRoch - Feb 10, 2026

(Jan 28, 2026 10:53 AM)Binance Wrote:  Cool. There's 100 different versions of this shit now. Even WormGPT isn't the original anymore (some blowhard ackbar is selling his "Version" here on HF), so many people try to piggy back off the names that were big and buzzy in 2023.
I used this before for research, did you buy it from https://t.me/fraudgptsales ?
If so, They use cloak.it which requires .js redirect on your index page under public_html . Gets your domain quickly botted and blacklisted though so it's good for like 24 hours lol.

It's not great GPT software and most of this shit will get you detected and flagged quickly. I wouldnt say it's good for practical use if that's what you're implying.

idk i bought this and it was ok but ur right... not exactly revolutionary...
not sure what i expected... but worth it for the internal hosting


do u think its weird a service does all the hosting for u?


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - ShellPower - Feb 10, 2026

Phising make a user connect to a specific site, while not intending to do so in the first place... SE should be on point i wouldn't waste time on the technical part but think of something more "threatening" if that's a pentest


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - JulienLaRoch - Feb 19, 2026

(Feb 10, 2026 10:32 AM)ShellPower Wrote:  Phising make a user connect to a specific site, while not intending to do so in the first place... SE should be on point i wouldn't waste time on the technical part but think of something more "threatening" if that's a pentest

okay... like user account ato...? not sure what can be more threatening.......


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - DriftMetrics - Mar 5, 2026

If you’re doing research, it’s better to focus on studying how detection systems work and test things only in controlled lab environments to understand security better.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Dotexe - Mar 5, 2026

Unfortunately you are really dumb. Have you checked the source code of the page ? having a script tag with 2 comments in it

Code
// Hardcoded user accounts - add new accounts here
// To add a new account, copy the template below and fill in the details:

And it has some sample accounts xD


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Binance - Mar 18, 2026

(Mar 5, 2026 01:24 AM)Dotexe Wrote:  Unfortunately you are really dumb. Have you checked the source code of the page ? having a script tag with 2 comments in it

Code
// Hardcoded user accounts - add new accounts here
// To add a new account, copy the template below and fill in the details:

And it has some sample accounts xD

I don't understand which page you're referring to, otherwise still LOL


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Dotexe - Mar 18, 2026

(Mar 18, 2026 09:02 AM)Binance Wrote:  I don't understand which page you're referring to, otherwise still LOL

The login endpoint of fraudgpt.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Binance - Mar 18, 2026

(Mar 18, 2026 09:11 AM)Dotexe Wrote:  The login endpoint of fraudgpt.

it doesnt have a clearnet site so .app , .chat and .org are all not the actual iteration op was speaking of.

I see what youre talking about now.


RE: Fraud GPT? Phishing pages for simulation? - Dotexe - Mar 18, 2026

(Mar 18, 2026 11:44 AM)Binance Wrote:  it doesnt have a clearnet site so .app , .chat and .org are all not the actual iteration op was speaking of.

I see what youre talking about now.

Most likely yeah, I was only referring for that instance, people are not even trying to clone it properly, with a little bit of research and you can see it's an AI slop.