![]() |
|
[Advice Needed] [INTEREST CHECK] - Local Uncensored LLM Auto-Reply Engine w/ Full Local Support - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105) +--- Forum: Bazaar (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=450) +---- Forum: Marketplace Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=163) +---- Thread: [Advice Needed] [INTEREST CHECK] - Local Uncensored LLM Auto-Reply Engine w/ Full Local Support (/showthread.php?tid=6324220) |
[INTEREST CHECK] - Local Uncensored LLM Auto-Reply Engine w/ Full Local Support - Ratt Pack - Apr 21, 2026 TL;DR: Built a platform-agnostic local LLM uncensored chat automation tool, ~80% complete. Looking for feedback on real-world use cases and rough pricing expectations before final push. Overview The tool is a local-first automation layer that sits between a GGUF-compatible LLM runtime (Ollama) and any chat interface, undetected. Core value prop: full stealth workflow customization without cloud dependencies or token costs - operating on cron or looping. Current Feature Set: - Platform-agnostic hook system — attach to any chat surface or build headless pipelines - Native GGUF model loading with context/parameter control per workflow node - Visual/config-driven workflow builder — conditional branching, multi-turn chains, uncensored persona assignment - Synthetic data generation mode with structured output formatting - Internal chatbot deployment mode — persistent context, session management Target Use Cases: - You tell me. I can add features to support your use case before full build is deployed for testing. Questions for the community: 1. Does this solve a problem you've actually hit? 2. What platform integrations would be non-negotiable for you? 3. Pricing — one-time license, tiered sub, or open core + enterprise? What's fair / you'd pay? 4. Would you want this as a desktop app, CLI, or self-hosted web UI? Will drop a demo video if there's real interest here. Appreciate any honest feedback including 'this already exists, see X.' |