+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Grayhat • Purple Team • Hybrid Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=449)
+---- Forum: Website Hacking (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=43)
+---- Thread: The Evolution of Websites: How 10 Popular Websites Have (And Have Not) Changed (/showthread.php?tid=91573)
The Evolution of Websites: How 10 Popular Websites Have (And Have Not) Changed - Ŀucien Lachance - Jun 20, 2009
Code
I was in high school in the mid-nineties when I first encountered the ever-expanding world of websites. At the time, I didn't realize that my future career would rely on this industry -- one which did not exist when I was in elementary school. Now in the year 2008, having created websites for over half my life, I look back and see how much websites have changed in the last decade and a half. At the same time, I can see how little they've changed as well, and I've realized that the internet as we know it today is only a teenager, with many years of growth still ahead.Interesting stuff.
Remember hackers, even good looking sites have vulnerabilities.
- Zerø - Jun 20, 2009
I dont understand OPS sig. It seems to have two sides to the whole creationism vs other arguments. It that was meant to happen, bravo for at least putting two sides on there. I liked that video, he argued the shit outta those engineers.
- Ŀucien Lachance - Jun 21, 2009
(Jun 20, 2009 12:38 PM)AlexDMadness Wrote: I dont understand OPS sig. It seems to have two sides to the whole creationism vs other arguments. It that was meant to happen, bravo for at least putting two sides on there. I liked that video, he argued the shit outta those engineers.
Roflmao.
The atheist religion is known as the invisible pink unicorn.
What the fuck? I posted a link to the site I got that quote from ... what the hell happened to it??
- n3xus - Jun 21, 2009
If anything, good looking sites are more likely to have more bugs, as dynamic content vulnerabilities are increasingly discovered. That poorly coded php function could cost you your database.
- Ŀucien Lachance - Jun 21, 2009
(Jun 21, 2009 06:11 PM)n3xus Wrote: If anything, good looking sites are more likely to have more bugs, as dynamic content vulnerabilities are increasingly discovered. That poorly coded php function could cost you your database.
A valid point.
http://www.wakeuplater.com/website-building/evolution-of-websites-10-popular-websites.aspx
There's the site. I can't edit my first post, Admin must have locked it or something.