![]() |
|
Finding Something That Can HOLD Huge Number of Bot - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Botnets and Botting (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=92) +---- Thread: Finding Something That Can HOLD Huge Number of Bot (/showthread.php?tid=1959136) |
* - Io0oI - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 11:16 AM)I_am_DdoseR Wrote: I am not using Icrypt, I am not scanning at virustotal. C&P from the website pub info,and post them as a dream I dont get it .is it updated every 3 hours (8 times a day) or 5 time a day any way do you know what is polymorphism ? (Nov 27, 2011 11:16 AM)I_am_DdoseR Wrote: JS, HTML, EXE, DLL, SWF, PDF, IFrame; exactly,you really dont, polymorphism refers to self replicating it has nothing to do with obfuscation,you will get a totaly different structure,almost a new variant,yes some guys obfuscat a code or crypt it and then call it a "full private legit polymorfic system",wish it is not.Adding some junk code or coding a crypting program has nothing to do with coding a self-crypting program.imagine making a machine that will execute one order and only one,and making a machine that can take decisions and execute different orders. It is totaly different.this is why we call it polymorphic and not monomorphic about the offer,no man,I 'll past ,I can do better things with that money * - I_am_DdoseR - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 12:24 PM)Io0oI Wrote: C&P from the website pub info,and post them as a dream Yes i know what is polymorphism and this system works perfectly , never get detected . 👍 Okay , bro . * - Suhinder - Nov 27, 2011 I'd go with an IRC botnet or an HTTP Botnet that's worth around $500 - $1000 if you're actually going to hold a large number of bots. * - dfs - Nov 27, 2011 a good http bot with a good vps or dedi ive heard auttumn is good just got to spend the money * - g0dspeak - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 10:06 AM)I_am_DdoseR Wrote: Hf is 90% from skids , using shellbooters and etc. Also schoolbots like autumn and 90% 20 TH CENTURY OLD IRC BOTNET METHOD Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious? I bet you 99.9% of the "real hackers" Use IRC or HTTP protocol for their botnets, not their home motherfucking connections like your stupid ass, moronic self. I guess i'll see you in Federal Prison too then. Have fun getting fucked in the asshole by a 6' 4", 350lb black guy named Ted, I hope you enjoy his 14" cock. You make up the "90% of HF skids". * - I_am_DdoseR - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 01:19 PM)g0dspeak Wrote: Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious? I bet you 99.9% of the "real hackers" Use IRC or HTTP protocol for their botnets, not their home motherfucking connections like your stupid ass, moronic self. I guess i'll see you in Federal Prison too then. Have fun getting fucked in the asshole by a 6' 4", 350lb black guy named Ted, I hope you enjoy his 14" cock. Idiot, no one from serious hacker users IRC. IDIOT! I said hackers use HTTP but it needs much more money for holding botnet on HTTP , Just read another messages and don't take message from context. Skid . 🤫🤦♂🤦♂ It's better for hackforums member to use hostbooter and not own connection , vds / vps. * - 127.O.O.1 - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 10:18 AM)IniTiAliZe Wrote: Vertexloader it is Stable to hold slave? NO vertexloader blows its an unstable peice of shit. Try ubot its free but it still isnt very stable.. better then vertex though and prolly the best free one * - Flowz - Nov 27, 2011 I have masturbate furiously to this thread, the ignorance and stupidity have blown my mind. IRC is one of the MOST anonymous way of communicating through the internet. Trust me, hackers use IRC. After it's discovery, hackers fell in love with it and started to create malware compitable with it. Now the generation of centralized botnets are moving to HTTP for various reasons, as safety, costreducing and many other. As if we would apply the logic of "hostbooter" being a P2P-bot, then we could just say IRC, HTTP are P2P-protocols.. But nowadays malware using a (raw) TCP-socket to interference have given a whole new and wrong defenition to P2P. A bot using this TCP-socket technique as engine for the client and server to interference is the best (but it isn't a P2P-network). But for the botmaster to interference with the server would using HTTP be excellent as it provides a widely known and implented protocol. It also has the ability to present some nice appeal for the eye. * - TEAM UNKNOW - Nov 27, 2011 try ubot it can hold 10k but it has no ddos so yahh if you want to ddos try Cythisia Botnet * - _Gorhax - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 11:16 AM)I_am_DdoseR Wrote: "Like you" Shit on my dick! Fucking $20.00 a crypt on that site? You shitting in my cereal brah? Better stay FUD for 3 months at that price.. * - I_am_DdoseR - Nov 27, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 05:33 PM)_Gorhax Wrote: Shit on my dick! Fucking $20.00 a crypt on that site? You shitting in my cereal brah? Better stay FUD for 3 months at that price.. I have a lot of money this is not problem to me + it's FUD for long time 🎉🎉 * - wacked3 - Nov 28, 2011 (Nov 27, 2011 03:13 PM)Flowz Wrote: Now the generation of centralized botnets are moving to HTTP for various reasons, as safety, costreducing and many other. IRC, HTTP are P2P-protocols.Do you see the mistake? (Nov 27, 2011 03:13 PM)Flowz Wrote: But nowadays malware using a (raw) TCP-socket to interference have given a whole new defenition to P2P. A bot using this TCP-socket technique as engine for the client and server to interference is the best.That depends on several things. Firstly raw TCP Socket? It will be TCP or UDP (and let the OS build the various headers for you), there is no advantage of using RAW Sockets. Also what about companies that care about their network and block uncommon traffic? HTTP would be a better choice there. Though with a custom protocol you do have more room for optimization. * - Flowz - Nov 28, 2011 (Nov 28, 2011 08:48 AM)wacked3 Wrote: Do you see the mistake?Well people call "hostbooter" a P2P-bot but I am almost certain that it's a centralized botnet. I see your point and it's valid. I've always had in mind that raw sockets were faster. True on that one but if a botnet were to be operated through HTTP , then the company would have blocked any site other then the ones they use. They would also analyse all the traffic even the HTTP-traffic. * - theExchange - Nov 28, 2011 Emotions Loader will help you - as long as you can afford it :D http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/220/emotionsz.png/ * - _Gorhax - Nov 28, 2011 (Nov 28, 2011 09:59 AM)assfuck Wrote: Emotions Loader will help you - as long as you can afford it :D Prove that is your net or you are a big phony and need to gtfo. |