(Jul 12, 2016 05:56 AM)Dramario Wrote:  Which vpn is the best if I want crack account via sentry mba?

(Jul 12, 2016 05:56 AM)Dramario Wrote:  Which vpn is the best if I want crack account via sentry mba?

(Jul 12, 2016 05:56 AM)Previously Known As.... Wrote:  I do like Cryptostorm, and went to add them to my list. It has been a long time since I used them however, and when I checked their server locations it appeared they removed a majority of their stronger locations. Can you confirm that this list is accurate for their server locations, or do they have more that are not listed? https://uptime.statuscake.com/?TestID=tZj3HbyKm5

I wasn't going to list them if their Swiss location is their only strong-ish location left. They are a great company overall though, and I frequently follow their news and updates regarding privacy across the globe.

(Jul 12, 2016 05:56 AM)Dramario Wrote:  Which vpn is the best if I want crack account via sentry mba?

(Jul 12, 2016 02:57 PM)RΟΟT Wrote:  Awesome thread. I can vouch for ZorroVPN and TorGuard, really professional services. I used CryptoStorm too for a month a long time ago, can't complain either.

[censored] is decent too, many locations, good up time, BTC, killswitch other nice features. Another cool one I have used is 24VC, good for Stealths, they don't take BTC though.

And... also have used a $20 lifetime VPN from HF, it only loads on one location from the 15 advertised🤣.


VPN's do not work for that, better get proxies from SSLProxies24.

(Jul 12, 2016 02:57 PM)RΟΟT Wrote:  Awesome thread. I can vouch for ZorroVPN and TorGuard, really professional services. I used CryptoStorm too for a month a long time ago, can't complain either.

[censored] is decent too, many locations, good up time, BTC, killswitch other nice features. Another cool one I have used is 24VC, good for Stealths, they don't take BTC though.

And... also have used a $20 lifetime VPN from HF, it only loads on one location from the 15 advertised🤣.


VPN's do not work for that, better get proxies from SSLProxies24.

(Jul 12, 2016 04:11 PM)KFC Watermelon Wrote:  Most people want a VPN with dedicated port forwarding. Not many people realize this, but if you're using a dedicated port on a VPN, you are 100% traceable and there is nothing you (or the VPN owner) can do about it.

(Jul 12, 2016 04:12 PM)Scymo Wrote:  Can you expand on this?

I'm using Private Internet Access (when not on HF), is this dedicated port forwarding?

(Jul 12, 2016 04:11 PM)KFC Watermelon Wrote:  Most people want a VPN with dedicated port forwarding. Not many realize this, but if you're using a dedicated port on a VPN, you are 100% traceable and there is nothing you (or the VPN owner) can do about it.

Quote:A newly discovered vulnerability can expose the real IP-addresses of VPN users with relative ease. The issue, which affects all VPN protocols and operating systems, was uncovered by Perfect Privacy who alerted several affected competitors to the threat before making it public.

For the past several years interest in encrypted and anonymous communications has spread to a much wider audience.

VPN providers are particularly popular among BitTorrent users, who by default broadcast their IP-addresses to hundreds of people when downloading a popular file.

The goal of using a VPN is to hide one’s ISP IP-address, but a newly discovered vulnerability shows that this is easily bypassed on some providers.

The problem, uncovered by VPN provider Perfect Privacy (PP), is a simple port forwarding trick. If an attacker uses the same VPN as the victim the true IP-address can be exposed by forwarding traffic on a specific port.

The security flaw affects all VPN protocols including OpenVPN and IPSec and applies to all operating systems.

“Affected are VPN providers that offer port forwarding and have no protection against this specific attack,” PP notes.

For example, if an attacker activates port forwarding for the default BitTorrent port then a VPN user on the same network will expose his or her real IP-address (in a setting where users share the same IP-address).

The same is true for regular web traffic, but in that case the attacker has to direct the victim to a page that connects to the forwarded port, as Perfect Privacy explains in detail.

The vulnerability affected the setup of various large VPN providers, who were warned last week. This included Private Internet Access (PIA), Ovpn.to and nVPN, who have all fixed the issue before publication.

PIA informs TorrentFreak that their fix was relatively simple and was implemented swiftly after they were notified.

“We implemented firewall rules at the VPN server level to block access to forwarded ports from clients’ real IP addresses. The fix was deployed on all our servers within 12 hours of the initial report,” PIA’s Amir Malik says.

In addition, PIA complimented Perfect Privacy for responsibly disclosing the vulnerability prior to making it public and awarded their competitor with a $5,000 bounty under its Whitehat Alert Security Program.

Not all VPN providers were tested so it is likely that many others are still vulnerable. Hopefully, these will address the issue in the near future.

Update: PIA’s initial solution didn’t fix the problem. The company informed its users via email and recommends them to download the latest version of the client.

(Jul 12, 2016 04:50 PM)Asatru Valknut Wrote:  I see a total of 3 good ones there.

(Jul 12, 2016 03:11 AM)Previously Known As.... Wrote:  VPN: Double VPN
Payment Method: BTC, PM, WMZ
Notable Server Locations: CH, ES, IT, NL, RO
Price Per Month (Standard): $25
Price Per Month (Double VPN): $36
Price Per Month (Multi Double): $42
Price Per Month (Triple VPN): $42