Hack Forums
Online anonymous crypting service, C/Assembly, $20/crypt - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Premium (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=451)
+---- Forum: Cryptography and Encryption Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=299)
+---- Thread: Online anonymous crypting service, C/Assembly, $20/crypt (/showthread.php?tid=5524345)

Pages: Pages 1 2 3 4 5


* - ©Ratatouille™ - Jan 20, 2017

(Jan 20, 2017 05:05 PM)The Unknown Coder Wrote:  What did you test with? Hopefully not putty like OP. If you tested with something real let op know so he can update his scan into something valid.

Yes with Netwire , Zyklon


* - The Unknown Coder - Jan 20, 2017

(Jan 20, 2017 06:22 PM)©Ratatouille™ Wrote:  Yes with Netwire , Zyklon

Then op shouldn't have a problem doing a scan on dyncheck with netwire since he has free scans as stated on his other thread.


Assuming you are telling the truth. It would just improve his sales greatly. Looking forward to it!


* - onlinecrypt - Jan 21, 2017

(Jan 20, 2017 06:40 PM)The Unknown Coder Wrote:  Then op shouldn't have a problem doing a scan on dyncheck with netwire since he has free scans as stated on his other thread.


Assuming you are telling the truth. It would just improve his sales greatly. Looking forward to it!

please man
stop posting

if you want to know result to runtime check
purchase then post on my topic with request of scan

thnx


* - Slavoj Žižek - Jan 24, 2017

This looks great, good luck with sales.


* - onlinecrypt - Jan 26, 2017

hello

service had some days off
contact for bonuses

sorry

and it's back clean

happy crypting

regards


* - #Exploit - Jan 27, 2017

I tested it , but its detected from 2 ( NOD32 & Kaspersky ) RUNTIME !

It seems legit but I wish it will be really %100 FUD and having priv8 stub option + maybe monthly subscriptions .


* - onlinecrypt - Jan 27, 2017

(Jan 27, 2017 05:38 AM)ℒℯᘜℯηD҉ Wrote:  I tested it , but its detected from 2 ( NOD32 & Kaspersky ) RUNTIME !

It seems legit but I wish it will be really %100 FUD and having priv8 stub option + maybe monthly subscriptions .

hello

we already have monthly subscription
private stub is not possible sorry

nod32 surely your malware, send file on xmpp for verification

kaspersky is scantime, on-click detection, it's not present on VirusCheckMate, only Scan4You
in process of fixing

thanks


* - onlinecrypt - Jan 30, 2017

hello

coder cleaned kaspersky (emulation detect)

happy crypting


* - The Unknown Coder - Feb 1, 2017

(Jan 31, 2017 12:21 PM)mehtevas Wrote:  short story:

everyone thinks you are wardow

if you are him or not?

no one knows

I doubt he is Wardow. As Wardow actually manages to prove runtime on his thread. This guy used putty and when I kept asking he got pissy yet he failed to prove something basic I highly doubt thats Wardow as he would know how the market works.


* - onlinecrypt - Feb 1, 2017

(Feb 1, 2017 09:39 AM)The Unknown Coder Wrote:  I doubt he is Wardow. As Wardow actually manages to prove runtime on his thread. This guy used putty and when I kept asking he got pissy yet he failed to prove something basic I highly doubt thats Wardow as he would know how the market works.

oke man why are you doing critisim when you can't afford a single crypt and have your talking justified
the service has nothing to prove to anyone, it is already etablished on various forums

runtime detection is a sensitive subject

the crypt will not add runtime detect to your file, it can remove some, but never add
if some still exist after crypting, you need to change your file

that's how it works

it would be meaningless to test with something that has its own runtime detect or fingerprinting

it is not going to be done

but! you can buy and do it yourself then post it

but it would still be meaningless to the quality of this one service (i agree that it can give an idea)


cleaned -

RESULTS: 0/35
AVG Free - OK
Avast - OK
AntiVir (Avira) - OK
BitDefender - OK
Clam - OK
COMODO - OK
Dr.Web - OK
eTrust-Vet - OK
F-PROT - OK
F-Secure - OK
G Data - OK
IKARUS - OK
Kaspersky - OK
McAfee - OK
MS Essentials - OK
ESET NOD32 - OK
Norman - OK
Norton - OK
Panda - OK
A-Squared - OK
Quick Heal - OK
Solo - OK
Sophos - OK
Trend Micro - OK
VBA32 - OK
Zoner AntiVirus - OK
Ad-Aware - OK
BullGuard - OK
FortiClient - OK
K7 Ultimate - OK
NANO - OK
Panda CommandLine - OK
SUPERAntiSpyware - OK
Twister - OK
VIPRE - OK

File Name TestScanPackage.exe
File Size: 371540
File MD5: f7365104a7834afe1350d3956ea20b70
File SHA1: a37885431ccc6ac4af2a759b674b979235cfb5c8
Check Time: 2017-02-02 17:56:16

Scan report generated by
Scan4You.Net



* - drewkasp - Feb 6, 2017

All this arguments got me scared to buy, OP can you prove him wrong for our sake?
Also confirm best settings to use for Netwire and LL stub before crypting.


* - onlinecrypt - Feb 6, 2017

(Feb 6, 2017 04:41 PM)drewkasp Wrote:  All this arguments got me scared to buy, OP can you prove him wrong for our sake?
Also confirm best settings to use for Netwire and LL stub before crypting.

he not a buyer
he just likes to talk shit about things he dont know about

service will crypt files, whatever they are, if the file does not work, refund/credit is given


* - Kisame - Feb 8, 2017

I would be interested if I knew the average FUD time and runtime/scantime stats.
Can you update me with that, OP?


* - onlinecrypt - Feb 8, 2017

(Feb 8, 2017 11:57 AM)David Gilmour Wrote:  I would be interested if I knew the average FUD time and runtime/scantime stats.
Can you update me with that, OP?

average scantime fud 12hours and 30 minutes

check first post for the rest


* - Kisame - Feb 9, 2017

(Feb 8, 2017 12:19 PM)onlinecrypt Wrote:  average scantime fud 12hours and 30 minutes

check first post for the rest

I don't really think that's normal for a 20 dollar private crypt..
Crypters like static crypt can often do that or will go to 1/35 in 1 day...

I've had private crypts before and they used to last weeks and sometimes even months. I am sorry but this is not worth 20 dollars (for me).