(Jan 20, 2017 05:05 PM)The Unknown Coder Wrote: What did you test with? Hopefully not putty like OP. If you tested with something real let op know so he can update his scan into something valid.
Yes with Netwire , Zyklon
![[Image: tIUCpQ.gif]](https://vgy.me/tIUCpQ.gif)
Online anonymous crypting service, C/Assembly, $20/crypt |
 Yes with Netwire , Zyklon
Jan 20, 2017 06:40 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 20, 2017 06:41 PM by The Unknown Coder.)
(Jan 20, 2017 06:22 PM)©Ratatouille™ Wrote: Yes with Netwire , Zyklon Then op shouldn't have a problem doing a scan on dyncheck with netwire since he has free scans as stated on his other thread. Assuming you are telling the truth. It would just improve his sales greatly. Looking forward to it! (Jan 20, 2017 06:40 PM)The Unknown Coder Wrote: Then op shouldn't have a problem doing a scan on dyncheck with netwire since he has free scans as stated on his other thread. please man stop posting if you want to know result to runtime check purchase then post on my topic with request of scan thnx  
Jan 27, 2017 02:41 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 27, 2017 02:41 PM by onlinecrypt.)
(Jan 27, 2017 05:38 AM)#Exploit Wrote: I tested it , but its detected from 2 ( NOD32 & Kaspersky ) RUNTIME ! hello we already have monthly subscription private stub is not possible sorry nod32 surely your malware, send file on xmpp for verification kaspersky is scantime, on-click detection, it's not present on VirusCheckMate, only Scan4You in process of fixing thanks
Feb 1, 2017 09:39 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 1, 2017 09:40 AM by The Unknown Coder.)
(Jan 31, 2017 12:21 PM)mehtevas Wrote: short story: I doubt he is Wardow. As Wardow actually manages to prove runtime on his thread. This guy used putty and when I kept asking he got pissy yet he failed to prove something basic I highly doubt thats Wardow as he would know how the market works.
Feb 1, 2017 03:54 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 2, 2017 08:57 AM by onlinecrypt.)
(Feb 1, 2017 09:39 AM)The Unknown Coder Wrote: I doubt he is Wardow. As Wardow actually manages to prove runtime on his thread. This guy used putty and when I kept asking he got pissy yet he failed to prove something basic I highly doubt thats Wardow as he would know how the market works. oke man why are you doing critisim when you can't afford a single crypt and have your talking justified the service has nothing to prove to anyone, it is already etablished on various forums runtime detection is a sensitive subject the crypt will not add runtime detect to your file, it can remove some, but never add if some still exist after crypting, you need to change your file that's how it works it would be meaningless to test with something that has its own runtime detect or fingerprinting it is not going to be done but! you can buy and do it yourself then post it but it would still be meaningless to the quality of this one service (i agree that it can give an idea) cleaned - RESULTS: 0/35 AVG Free - OK Avast - OK AntiVir (Avira) - OK BitDefender - OK Clam - OK COMODO - OK Dr.Web - OK eTrust-Vet - OK F-PROT - OK F-Secure - OK G Data - OK IKARUS - OK Kaspersky - OK McAfee - OK MS Essentials - OK ESET NOD32 - OK Norman - OK Norton - OK Panda - OK A-Squared - OK Quick Heal - OK Solo - OK Sophos - OK Trend Micro - OK VBA32 - OK Zoner AntiVirus - OK Ad-Aware - OK BullGuard - OK FortiClient - OK K7 Ultimate - OK NANO - OK Panda CommandLine - OK SUPERAntiSpyware - OK Twister - OK VIPRE - OK File Name TestScanPackage.exe File Size: 371540 File MD5: f7365104a7834afe1350d3956ea20b70 File SHA1: a37885431ccc6ac4af2a759b674b979235cfb5c8 Check Time: 2017-02-02 17:56:16 Scan report generated by Scan4You.Net  (Feb 6, 2017 04:41 PM)drewkasp Wrote: All this arguments got me scared to buy, OP can you prove him wrong for our sake? he not a buyer he just likes to talk shit about things he dont know about service will crypt files, whatever they are, if the file does not work, refund/credit is given (Feb 8, 2017 11:57 AM)Kisame Wrote: I would be interested if I knew the average FUD time and runtime/scantime stats. average scantime fud 12hours and 30 minutes check first post for the rest (Feb 8, 2017 12:19 PM)onlinecrypt Wrote: average scantime fud 12hours and 30 minutes I don't really think that's normal for a 20 dollar private crypt.. Crypters like static crypt can often do that or will go to 1/35 in 1 day... I've had private crypts before and they used to last weeks and sometimes even months. I am sorry but this is not worth 20 dollars (for me). |
|
|
![[Image: OBhBxne.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/OBhBxne.jpg)
