+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Bazaar (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=450)
+---- Forum: Marketplace Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=163)
+---- Thread: [Community Alert] Kicking - UID 1755309 - Attempted Re-branding of an already sold product (/showthread.php?tid=5626269)
* - SIM-2875347 - May 21, 2017
(May 21, 2017 06:06 AM)RAT Support Wrote: Hope this stays public for a long time because I hate people who do stuff like this.
You have shown the community how untrustworthy you are now good luck getting that trust back.
That's the goal! This thread isn't going to be closed for as long as he's here
* - NuclearKrabs - May 22, 2017
Can confirm this happened, also refrain from purchasing eCrypter because the new refudder and kicking managed to break the stub in a wonderful manner.
* - eL Dalfia - May 22, 2017
Not suprised... HF staff gonna ignore this? smh
* - Mαxim - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 07:10 AM)eL Dalfia Wrote: Not suprised... HF staff gonna ignore this? smh
They do not get involved with deals. They would if they had infinite time, but unfourtantely they don't.
* - SIM-2875347 - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 07:11 AM)Mαxim Wrote: They do not get involved with deals. They would if they had infinite time, but unfourtantely they don't.
Unfortunately yes that's how it works. It's understandable since there's so many disputes/CA's on this forum they would need like 20 staff to handle them all.
* - eL Dalfia - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 07:11 AM)Mαxim Wrote: They do not get involved with deals. They would if they had infinite time, but unfourtantely they don't.
yea but why handle none? they will ban for "low quality" but not even look at deal disputes? what kinda logic is that
* - Mαxim - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 08:08 AM)eL Dalfia Wrote: yea but why handle none? they will ban for "low quality" but not even look at deal disputes? what kinda logic is that
I am sorry but you cannot expect them to check every deal dispute/community alert thread and review the validity of it. It would be a huge waste of time, the community has the tool it needs to be able to deal safely (trust scan and it's additions).
* - eL Dalfia - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 08:10 AM)Mαxim Wrote: I am sorry but you cannot expect them to check every deal dispute/community alert thread and review the validity of it. It would be a huge waste of time, the community has the tool it needs to be able to deal safely (trust scan and it's additions).
True im not saying all.. but why not spend more time here in the important section then wasting time hunting for trolls?
* - Mαxim - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 08:23 AM)eL Dalfia Wrote: True im not saying all.. but why not spend more time here in the important section then wasting time hunting for trolls?
Obviously I can't speak for the staffs but only from my observations. Well because Hack Forums is not a marketplace forum. Hunting for trolls is more important than wasting time reviewing deal disputes. If you still don't fully understand it, PM me and I can explain more in-depth.
Won't go anymore off-topic now. My apologies.
* - eL Dalfia - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 08:26 AM)Mαxim Wrote: Obviously I can't speak for the staffs but only from my observations. Well because Hack Forums is not a marketplace forum. Hunting for trolls is more important than wasting time reviewing deal disputes. If you still don't fully understand it, PM me and I can explain more in-depth.
Won't go anymore off-topic now. My apologies.
I disagree but holy shit you are polite lmao
* - SIM-2875347 - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 06:32 PM)eL Dalfia Wrote: I disagree but holy shit you are polite lmao
Can we go back on topic now? This has taken up like an entire page :P
* - eL Dalfia - May 22, 2017
(May 22, 2017 07:38 PM)Buildoman Wrote: Can we go back on topic now? This has taken up like an entire page :P
I agree with you 100% sadly nothing will be done tho
* - eL Dalfia - May 23, 2017
(May 22, 2017 10:34 PM)Friedrich Nietzsche Wrote: Because proof can be faked. Staffs do take action when they are 100% sure the user scammed, which is rarely the case.
Yae the guy even admited it though on this thread lol
* - SIM-2875347 - May 23, 2017
(May 22, 2017 10:34 PM)Friedrich Nietzsche Wrote: Because proof can be faked. Staffs do take action when they are 100% sure the user scammed, which is rarely the case.
(May 23, 2017 01:34 AM)eL Dalfia Wrote: Yae the guy even admited it though on this thread lol
It doesn't matter because if they did take action on this report then they would be obligated to do the others. Now let's please stay on the thread topic, el Dalfia feel free to PM me of you want to continue this discussion.
* - Ancestral - May 23, 2017
Hi there!
I've been friends with Kicking for almost 8 years. I know that if he'd had the source for this, he'd already do it. I mean, I have the source for when I originally owned it, but that's because I build up an arsenal of sources so I can look back in the past. I'm not, and never will I resell or reskin source codes.
Best wishes,
Ancestral