+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hack Forums Official Information (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Site News (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Suggestions and Ideas (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=134)
+---- Thread: Mentor Group (/showthread.php?tid=405758)
* - Taserz - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 02:51 PM)Braco22 Wrote: This would be a sick thing really. Requirements like
1000 posts
60+ rep
no warning points
no -rep
Or something similar to what I wrote.
Rep is meaning less besides -neg you are aware correct. Any one can scam just because they got 10 +3 reps for giving out a free crypt does NOT make them a legitimate seller or whatever.
* - Socco - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 02:56 PM)Fireren Wrote: I personally like this idea.
It would be great way to see which members could have great potential not only to support the staff but also so that when MyBB 2.0 comes out and you begin appointing moderator's to different sections you'll have some choices. Furthermore, it would be a great way to regulate the rules and bad posting. I understand that this will take weeks to implement if you choose to do so, but I'm behind it 100%.
P.S. Spoiler (Click to View)
This, exactly this. :)
* - Braco Asshole - May 6, 2010
You make a point there Taserz, lets leave it to Omniscient.
* - Taserz - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 02:58 PM)Braco22 Wrote: You make a point there Taserz, lets leave it to Omniscient.
Main reason I said that. Ive been here longer then most of the still active members here and ive seen quite a few really high repped people get banned and get countless scam reports against them. I still am 100% clean only 1 scam report thread on me. But everyone in the thread said Thank you Taser for the Full refund lol. (I don't like it when what I sell goes wrong even if it costs me)
* - Braco Asshole - May 6, 2010
Thats why I don't even sell.
* - Sam Fisher - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 03:00 PM)Taserz Wrote: Main reason I said that. Ive been here longer then most of the still active members here and ive seen quite a few really high repped people get banned and get countless scam reports against them. I still am 100% clean only 1 scam report thread on me. But everyone in the thread said Thank you Taser for the Full refund lol. (I don't like it when what I sell goes wrong even if it costs me)
I agree. IMO I think there should first be standard requirements, where if you meet those then you are allowed to apply. After you apply, it goes into a second stage where the applicant will be further reviewed and judged. It might take longer but it will ensure only quality members are Mentors, not people who just want a userbar.
* - -RC2- - May 6, 2010
This is a great idea, It would take alot of stress off of current staff, and as you said would be a good pathway for people to become staff.
* - Braco Asshole - May 6, 2010
Yeah and what Whizdom said also.
* - Forward Slash - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 03:05 PM)Whizdom™ Wrote: I agree. IMO I think there should first be standard requirements, where if you meet those then you are allowed to apply. After you apply, it goes into a second stage where the applicant will be further reviewed and judged. It might take longer but it will ensure only quality members are Mentors, not people who just want a userbar.
I think we will know more If/When Omni gets closer to putting this together ;)
* - R1chard™ - May 6, 2010
Good idea, I might apply ^__^
* - Taserz - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 03:05 PM)Whizdom™ Wrote: After that I think it should go into a second stage where the applicant will be further reviewed and judged. It might take longer but it will ensure only quality members are Mentors, not people who just want a userbar.
I agree 100% maybe have the Staff or Omni and Ibf approve who joins and what not. Since well those two know the gist of the members. Also limit the group so only X amount of people can be in it so it does not become a cluttered group like many.
* - Braco Asshole - May 6, 2010
Omniscient said that this group will help staff. And whoever is in this group will have more % of joining staff.
* - iBruteforce - May 6, 2010
I'm not seeing how this will assist staff at all.
* - Taserz - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 03:16 PM)iBruteforce Wrote: I'm not seeing how this will assist staff at all.
Me either but maybe we both didn't read it right im re reading it.
* - Forward Slash - May 6, 2010
(May 6, 2010 03:14 PM)Braco22 Wrote: Omniscient said that this group will help staff. And whoever is in this group will have more % of joining staff.
Perfect example of most suggestion threads or new official HF things.
Omni says this
Quote:Might even be a good pathway to joining staff.
Then members turn it into this
Quote:And whoever is in this group will have more % of joining staff.
Eventually it just changes so dramatically, everyone thinks that's true.
1: This is just an idea he has ran past us.
2: Obviously nothing is definite right now.