+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126)
+---- Thread: 2015 THE BEST CRYPTERS ON HF!| MY HONEST REVIEW | READ THIS BEFORE BUYING ANY CRYPTER (/showthread.php?tid=4959817)
* - Fộrcəd - Aug 28, 2015
(Aug 28, 2015 07:47 AM)Uiqueblhats Wrote: Hey dude can you check cryptx,cyber-seal and dark-eye v3 please
I will send the corresponding developers an PM regarding trial license of there products
* - Tyaa - Aug 29, 2015
Current scans of Abyss protect
refud.me/results.php?id=y9acjqoaeo2s1zdlerjs1afh82sdpm63cka
v2.scan.majyx.net/?page=results&sid=556649
* - matisshakeris - Aug 29, 2015
Hey by the way you need to test those crypter you can send the stub i have wmware with 6 diffrent antiviruses installed. :)
* - jmeredi - Aug 29, 2015
This looks really good, I just hope more sellers let you review them although I can see a few saying no because they know their product is crap. Maybe you could add a section stating which crypters were refused to you?
* - DeluxeSoftware - Sep 1, 2015
I gave Forced a trial license. - Thanks for your honest review! I'll link this thread in my sale thread.
* - Jalava - Sep 1, 2015
You have the same Option as me! Thx
* - faverte - Sep 1, 2015
KillαMuvz have detection 11/35
http://www.refud.me/results.php?id=68jxyqkf1rrvom3zzkgkrwkmfzlzdvg9yy6
and not suport .net, not offer suport
* - Seller - Sep 1, 2015
(Aug 28, 2015 05:38 AM)matisshakeris Wrote: By they are you interesteed in adding avira or nod32 AVS too? Since these are also good ones.
Anyway great review and you just saved me money
Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)
Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?
* - PirateSec - Sep 1, 2015
(Sep 1, 2015 11:18 AM)faverte Wrote: KillαMuvz have detection 11/35
http://www.refud.me/results.php?id=68jxyqkf1rrvom3zzkgkrwkmfzlzdvg9yy6
and not suport .net, not offer suport
Ok well first of all. All of those GEN detections is not because of the crypter. Somthing is up with your settings since GEN detections usually is because of your assembly/icon settings.
Second..... you're a retard if you don't think it supports .net
* - Fộrcəd - Sep 1, 2015
(Sep 1, 2015 11:26 AM)Excuse Wrote: Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)
Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?
I don't bother with scantime results because they can change all the time, and since i only receive 2-3 days trial license top i cant say anything about the FUD time.
That is why i only post runtime results
* - matisshakeris - Sep 1, 2015
Dolphin protector can bypass nod32 runtime so i suggest ya checking that one out
Though haven't yet tried it
* - GanDino - Sep 1, 2015
The best thread ever. Shitty crypter owner fear the shit. Finally a good ting to let everybody know about the offer on HF. To much idiots try to sell their detected shit and make money. the ones who work as advertised don't fear that thread. Why should they?
This thread helps a lot of pple to make their decision which crypter to buy, I found out that it's to expensive to buy cheap crypter. I would never buy a crypter where the owner feels like God, this is a disease here on HF. If crypters are wrong advertised, the owners are scammers, not Gods.
Nice thread anyway. Thanks for that.
* - cruspy - Sep 2, 2015
Nice thread. If only I had seen this before purchasing a month's subscription to another crypter not found on this list. It makes it past scantime but hardly ever goes for FUD runtime. I'll be checking out Data Protector based on the feedback I've been hearing about it. Definitely excited to see some positive reviews and honest vouches.
* - FastCrypt - Sep 3, 2015
(Sep 1, 2015 11:26 AM)Excuse Wrote: Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)
Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?
Really?
Hahahaha.
Private version of my online crypter : FastCrypt.us
* - n0$f3ratu$ - Sep 3, 2015
(Sep 3, 2015 03:32 AM)KeepFud Wrote: Really?
Hahahaha.
Private version of my online crypter : FastCrypt.us
That is shit.
Run a memory scan.
If it comes up clean,
then you can brag.