[Fộrcəd]

Hey dude can you check cryptx,cyber-seal and dark-eye v3 please

I will send the corresponding developers an PM regarding trial license of there products

[Tyaa]

Current scans of Abyss protect

refud.me/results.php?id=y9acjqoaeo2s1zdlerjs1afh82sdpm63cka

v2.scan.majyx.net/?page=results&sid=556649

[matisshakeris]

Hey by the way you need to test those crypter you can send the stub i have wmware with 6 diffrent antiviruses installed. :)

[jmeredi]

This looks really good, I just hope more sellers let you review them although I can see a few saying no because they know their product is crap. Maybe you could add a section stating which crypters were refused to you?

[DeluxeSoftware]

I gave Forced a trial license. - Thanks for your honest review! I'll link this thread in my sale thread.

[Jalava]

You have the same Option as me! Thx

[faverte]

KillαMuvz have detection 11/35
http://www.refud.me/results.php?id=68jxy...zlzdvg9yy6
and not suport .net, not offer suport

[Seller]

By they are you interesteed in adding avira or nod32 AVS too? Since these are also good ones.
Anyway great review and you just saved me money

Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)

Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?

[PirateSec]

KillαMuvz have detection 11/35
http://www.refud.me/results.php?id=68jxy...zlzdvg9yy6
and not suport .net, not offer suport

Ok well first of all. All of those GEN detections is not because of the crypter. Somthing is up with your settings since GEN detections usually is because of your assembly/icon settings.

Second..... you're a retard if you don't think it supports .net

[Fộrcəd]

Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)

Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?

I don't bother with scantime results because they can change all the time, and since i only receive 2-3 days trial license top i cant say anything about the FUD time.
That is why i only post runtime results

[matisshakeris]

Dolphin protector can bypass nod32 runtime so i suggest ya checking that one out
Though haven't yet tried it

[GanDino]

The best thread ever. Shitty crypter owner fear the shit. Finally a good ting to let everybody know about the offer on HF. To much idiots try to sell their detected shit and make money. the ones who work as advertised don't fear that thread. Why should they?

This thread helps a lot of pple to make their decision which crypter to buy, I found out that it's to expensive to buy cheap crypter. I would never buy a crypter where the owner feels like God, this is a disease here on HF. If crypters are wrong advertised, the owners are scammers, not Gods.

Nice thread anyway. Thanks for that.

[cruspy]

Nice thread. If only I had seen this before purchasing a month's subscription to another crypter not found on this list. It makes it past scantime but hardly ever goes for FUD runtime. I'll be checking out Data Protector based on the feedback I've been hearing about it. Definitely excited to see some positive reviews and honest vouches.

[FastCrypt]

Nod32 is very strong in these scene recently, i don't think any crypter can bypass it at this current stage(unless private build)

Also why won't you add a scan of each crypter?

Really?



Hahahaha.

Private version of my online crypter : FastCrypt.us

[n0$f3ratu$]

Really?



Hahahaha.

Private version of my online crypter : FastCrypt.us

That is shit.
Run a memory scan.
If it comes up clean,
then you can brag.