+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447)
+---- Forum: Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=126)
+---- Thread: which crypter do you recomend? no$crypter/star crypter/threat conceal/icrypt (/showthread.php?tid=2225048)
which crypter do you recomend? no$crypter/star crypter/threat conceal/icrypt - sandra1 - Feb 18, 2012
i just bought father crypter a week ago for 70$. couldnt make even one fud server. i don't want to be scammed again. please put here your opinion according to experience, which crypter is the best one.
thank you all
* - xPoverty - Feb 18, 2012
DarkEye sounds really good , but wait for more ppl to comment
* - Pumpkins - Feb 18, 2012
to be honest even 3/4 detections isnt THAT bad, but it's personal preference, for ease i'de pick star crypt, for functionality, I'de pick ThreatConceal, for compatibility? iCrypt.
* - Anatomy - Feb 18, 2012
I use cryptex 0/37 everytime. Well worth it even though they are having some problems atm. O-o
* - Silexx - Feb 18, 2012
i currently have icrypt but it gets detected in a day or two so im also looking for a new one
* - sandra1 - Feb 19, 2012
(Feb 18, 2012 01:57 PM)Soxs Wrote: to be honest even 3/4 detections isnt THAT bad, but it's personal preference, for ease i'de pick star crypt, for functionality, I'de pick ThreatConceal, for compatibility? iCrypt.
hello Soxs, it's interesting , it sounds like you tried all these crypters, can you please explain with more details about each one?
(Feb 18, 2012 02:04 PM)itachi09 Wrote: i currently have icrypt but it gets detected in a day or two so im also looking for a new one
do you have anyone in mind? if so please explaine.
hey everyone ,
please go inside vote and/or put your ideas
* - UnEntitled - Feb 19, 2012
No$Crypter is really good. It doesn't stay detected for very long. And it's only $15.
* - .CRz - Feb 19, 2012
Just to inform you that my crypter will have few votes becuse i also have few custumers by purpose of Long Lasting FUD, i also have a Minimum Requiriments before buy.
* - sandra1 - Feb 19, 2012
hello!!!, i need more opinions please.
* - Invulnerability - Feb 19, 2012
I would suggest you go for CrypteX
Take a look if you have time
* - .CRz - Feb 19, 2012
In my opinion n0$crypter will have the most percentage of votes as lot of people use n0$crypter.
* - Decker - Feb 19, 2012
I've used Threat Conceal in the past and was less than pleased with it and the support, but that was months ago. I wouldn't resubscribe to it again.
The best crypters on HF that I've used are No$crypter and Sheikh. The only issues I've had with either are relating to the binders. Sheikh Crypter's file binder always gives me .net errors and No$Crypter binder makes it detected to Avira. No$ crypter keeps files crypted for the longest by far that I've seen.
* - BlueDanube - Feb 19, 2012
(Feb 18, 2012 01:34 PM)sandra1 Wrote: i just bought father crypter a week ago for 70$. couldnt make even one fud server. i don't want to be scammed again. please put here your opinion according to experience, which crypter is the best one.
thank you all
I choose N0$Crypter. I've always received 0/37 detection rates on my files. It has a built-in scanner feature and automatic updates. Plus it's only $50 for lifetime and it's well worth it.
* - zerocool - Feb 19, 2012
This is amazing i have just got this and it does all you ask give it a look
2012 Crypter ◄ C# | Binder | Worm | Cloner | Spoofer [40+ Features] [20% Off]
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=2224661
* - sandra1 - Feb 19, 2012
(Feb 19, 2012 12:15 PM)Decker Wrote: I've used Threat Conceal in the past and was less than pleased with it and the support, but that was months ago. I wouldn't resubscribe to it again.
The best crypters on HF that I've used are No$crypter and Sheikh. The only issues I've had with either are relating to the binders. Sheikh Crypter's file binder always gives me .net errors and No$Crypter binder makes it detected to Avira. No$ crypter keeps files crypted for the longest by far that I've seen.
thanks , this was very helpfull 👍
(Feb 19, 2012 12:11 PM)Cyber.CRz Wrote: In my opinion n0$crypter will have the most percentage of votes as lot of people use n0$crypter.
why would you think TC is better? please explain