Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

which crypter do you recomend? no$crypter/star crypter/threat conceal/icrypt

i just bought father crypter a week ago for 70$. couldnt make even one fud server. i don't want to be scammed again. please put here your opinion according to experience, which crypter is the best one.
thank you all
DarkEye sounds really good , but wait for more ppl to comment
to be honest even 3/4 detections isnt THAT bad, but it's personal preference, for ease i'de pick star crypt, for functionality, I'de pick ThreatConceal, for compatibility? iCrypt.
[Image: cWKoYK1.gif]
I use cryptex 0/37 everytime. Well worth it even though they are having some problems atm. O-o
i currently have icrypt but it gets detected in a day or two so im also looking for a new one
(Feb 18, 2012 01:57 PM)Pumpkins Wrote:  to be honest even 3/4 detections isnt THAT bad, but it's personal preference, for ease i'de pick star crypt, for functionality, I'de pick ThreatConceal, for compatibility? iCrypt.

hello Soxs, it's interesting , it sounds like you tried all these crypters, can you please explain with more details about each one?


(Feb 18, 2012 02:04 PM)Silexx Wrote:  i currently have icrypt but it gets detected in a day or two so im also looking for a new one

do you have anyone in mind? if so please explaine.


hey everyone ,

please go inside vote and/or put your ideas
No$Crypter is really good. It doesn't stay detected for very long. And it's only $15.
Just to inform you that my crypter will have few votes becuse i also have few custumers by purpose of Long Lasting FUD, i also have a Minimum Requiriments before buy.
hello!!!, i need more opinions please.
I would suggest you go for CrypteX
Take a look if you have time
In my opinion n0$crypter will have the most percentage of votes as lot of people use n0$crypter.
I've used Threat Conceal in the past and was less than pleased with it and the support, but that was months ago. I wouldn't resubscribe to it again.

The best crypters on HF that I've used are No$crypter and Sheikh. The only issues I've had with either are relating to the binders. Sheikh Crypter's file binder always gives me .net errors and No$Crypter binder makes it detected to Avira. No$ crypter keeps files crypted for the longest by far that I've seen.
(Feb 18, 2012 01:34 PM)sandra1 Wrote:  i just bought father crypter a week ago for 70$. couldnt make even one fud server. i don't want to be scammed again. please put here your opinion according to experience, which crypter is the best one.
thank you all

I choose N0$Crypter. I've always received 0/37 detection rates on my files. It has a built-in scanner feature and automatic updates. Plus it's only $50 for lifetime and it's well worth it.
This is amazing i have just got this and it does all you ask give it a look

2012 Crypter ◄ C# | Binder | Worm | Cloner | Spoofer [40+ Features] [20% Off]
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=2224661
[Image: 83dy0m9HWMFCdD6X702akg.png]
(Feb 19, 2012 12:15 PM)Decker Wrote:  I've used Threat Conceal in the past and was less than pleased with it and the support, but that was months ago. I wouldn't resubscribe to it again.

The best crypters on HF that I've used are No$crypter and Sheikh. The only issues I've had with either are relating to the binders. Sheikh Crypter's file binder always gives me .net errors and No$Crypter binder makes it detected to Avira. No$ crypter keeps files crypted for the longest by far that I've seen.

thanks , this was very helpfull 👍


(Feb 19, 2012 12:11 PM).CRz Wrote:  In my opinion n0$crypter will have the most percentage of votes as lot of people use n0$crypter.

why would you think TC is better? please explain



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by johnyclubmanFeb 24, 2018 10:30 AM 0 138 Feb 24, 2018 10:30 AM
Last Post: johnyclubman
by DemoraliseSep 19, 2016 11:09 AM 5 297 Sep 19, 2016 11:09 AM
Last Post: NobodyX
by godofagodApr 10, 2016 04:01 AM 5 204 Apr 10, 2016 04:01 AM
Last Post: cocainaa