![]() |
|
[C] Favorite C compiler for Windows? - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [C] Favorite C compiler for Windows? (/showthread.php?tid=3476897) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
Favorite C compiler for Windows? - VipVince - May 13, 2013 I want to start working with C language. On windows at the moment and was wondering what compiler and debugger is most compatible for windows and user functionality? All suggestions welcome. * - van1lle - May 13, 2013 From my own experience I'd recommend using PellesC to start learning. Once you can code fluently switch over to Visual C++. * - ๖ۣۜDante - May 13, 2013 Microsoft's Visual C++ straight away. 🎉 * - Legеnd - May 13, 2013 I enjoy Codeblocks as it is quite simple, but different people have different preferences. I see most big projects coded in Visual Studio. (May 13, 2013 09:14 AM)Legеnd Wrote: I enjoy Codeblocks as it is quite simple, but different people have different preferences. I see most big projects coded in Visual Studio. Oh shit, sorry, Just realised you were talking about C. * - Shihanus - May 13, 2013 Microsoft's compiler is really nice, since it comes with Visual Studio which I think is an amazing IDE. Except past few weeks I've shifted over to gcc, and beginning to like that more than Microsoft's compiler. I think Microsoft's compiler does a lot for you when it comes to optimization, which I don't like; however, I like Microsoft's syntax of inline assembly. And gcc's is hard to grasp for me. Since it's a struggle between which compiler to chose. The other downside is gcc can't be used with Visual Studio, but I suppose if you're not worried about debugging then you can just write in VS and compile in gcc. I also don't like Microsoft's idea of typedefining all C datatypes into datatypes that only their compiler understands. So over all my choice is gcc. I feel like if you get used to Microsoft's compiler, you won't want to switch over to another or have difficulty when you do. * - The Elite Noob - May 13, 2013 None of those are compilers. They are IDEs. @OP, i highly suggest getting cygwin and install gcc on it. * - Shihanus - May 13, 2013 (May 13, 2013 12:47 PM)The Elite Noob Wrote: None of those are compilers. They are IDEs. @OP, i highly suggest getting cygwin and install gcc on it. Visual Studio comes with Microsoft's compiler. And I also stated it's a downside that Visual Studio doesn't allow use of other compilers. I would prefer gcc with VS. * - Immortal - May 13, 2013 I like minGw that comes with Dev-C++ http://sourceforge.net/projects/orwelldevcpp/ - most uptodate version. * - Sajuuk - May 13, 2013 For bigger projects: VC++ For smaller projects: Code::Blocks & MinGW * - VipVince - May 14, 2013 OT, how many of you code in C? I see very little tutorials on learning the language. * - Dutch Speed - May 14, 2013 visual studio, mingw is fucking retarded and code::blocks is even worse * - van1lle - May 14, 2013 (May 14, 2013 06:39 AM)VipVince Wrote: OT, how many of you code in C? I see very little tutorials on learning the language. I do (a bunch of years now). Don't learn from HF tutorials. Most of them are complete shit and most cover only the basics (I wonder how this comes cough 😅). Buy yourself a book about C and take some time to read it. * - ๖ۣۜDante - May 14, 2013 (May 14, 2013 06:39 AM)VipVince Wrote: OT, how many of you code in C? I see very little tutorials on learning the language. You can learn to code by reading/watching tutorials, but you can't be a "coder/programmer" by reading/watching tutorials. Just get a descent book like: C++ The complete reference, 4th edition and then read it while coding simultaneously. 🤫 * - engrαze - May 14, 2013 +1 on cygwin + gcc. Should work wonders. * - ngrBot - May 14, 2013 Microsoft Visual Studio + Virtual Assist X. |