![]() |
|
[.NET] RC4 Password Encrypter [Secure] - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444) +--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151) +---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118) +---- Thread: [.NET] RC4 Password Encrypter [Secure] (/showthread.php?tid=4247508) |
RC4 Password Encrypter [Secure] - $lick - May 24, 2014 [-]==[About]==[-] In this thread - Here - A user released an unsecure program. So as I was bored I made my own, Originally posted - Here And was asked to release it, So here it is. [-]==[Information]==[-] It uses RC4 Encryption with a password to save your accounts. The accounts are saved to the settings (Still encrypted) and re-added upon execution. The site is shown in a listview unencrypted but the username and passwords are shown still encrypted. You can select the item and decrypt the password using your encryption key to get a message box of your account details. [-]==[Pictures]==[-] ![]() ![]() [-]==[GIF]==[-] (Click to View) [-]==[Download]==[-] This was created in about 20 minutes while bored, It's honestly horribly coded... Download - Here Post to keep the thread alive. * - LordCoder - May 24, 2014 Nice release. I was searching how to do RC4 for .NET. I would love to have it. Thanks. * - Only3 - May 24, 2014 if u use the public old rc4 (string) then u gona have problem with unicode better use the byte one * - $lick - May 25, 2014 (May 24, 2014 11:58 PM)Only3 Wrote: if u use the public old rc4 (string) then u gona have problem with unicode better use the byte one Shit, Good point. I will do so later, Can't be bothered with it now. * - evolution74 - May 25, 2014 Why didn't you put the source of the encryption? Code Public Function rc4(ByVal message As String, ByVal password As String) As String* - $lick - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 04:35 AM)evolution74 Wrote: Why didn't you put the source of the encryption? That's not the source used, But thanks for posting it anyway. * - mullinupp - May 25, 2014 this one seems very interesting for me * - evolution74 - May 25, 2014 Sure is not: (Click to View) * - $lick - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 05:27 AM)evolution74 Wrote: Sure is not: Use spoilers on images. And it's not, The decompiler must have edited it. * - humet111 - May 25, 2014 very very thanks .... nice share ... * - evolution74 - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 05:37 AM)๖ۣۜLazy™ Wrote: And it's not, The decompiler must have edited it. What is more believable? 1) A top decompiler edited the code for no reason or 2) You don't want people to know you want to look good by using a free code from google * - $lick - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 05:58 AM)evolution74 Wrote: What is more believable? Are you somewhat retarded? That is NOT The code I use, Ask anybody that I have given the source too. EDIT: Also it says all over the program and all over the thread and even the fucking title of both that it uses RC4 I did not create RC4, Now please leave this thread. * - evolution74 - May 25, 2014 :) you're stupid you know? PS: You made my day coz I like to fuck with people * - LordCoder - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 05:58 AM)evolution74 Wrote: What is more believable? What are you saying? First of all .NET Reflector is much better than JustDecompile because .NET Reflector was the first stable decompiler. Second he didn't reinvented RC4 so anyone posted originally maybe? (May 25, 2014 06:26 AM)evolution74 Wrote: :) you're stupid you know?We don't need more people like you thanks. * - $lick - May 25, 2014 (May 25, 2014 06:26 AM)evolution74 Wrote: :) you're stupid you know? You're the stupid one here. The code you posted was still wrong and all your statements are false. You won't last here very long acting like a twat. |